Problem is that Dawkins is poore phylosopher!
We have epistimology (really good phylosophical discipline) which deals with knowledge! What it menas to "know" and what IS "knowledge".
So basic definition of "knowledge" is "justified belief".
What Dawkins does is redefines belief as negation of knowledge... it is "Unjustified belief".
But belief by it's very definition is "unjustified" in some framework. More "justification" is not bound to be in the context of methodological-naturalism, that would be special pledging and actually!
So problem with Dawkins is that he starts with "methodologica-naturalism" as justified in itself without applying his own definitions to his own base beliefs.
And epistimology declares that there is no possible justification in general sense, there will be this problem of infinit regression... This is the part which I noticed materialists are just plainly unable to understand and comprehand, coz it flies in the very face of their own doctrine. Each framweork and paradigm at it's very bottom starts with accepting some basic truth on faith, declaring them true without seeking another justification for them. Really materialism starts there too with it's own base core beliefs.
And more... when you mix methodological-naturalism with phylosophical naturalism then you are in deep.. s... eee... Europa :)
Shazard
JoinedPosts by Shazard
-
20
FAITH DEFINED. Heb 11:1 REALLY bad in NWT. Also Richard Dawkins' definition
by Open mind ini'm still slogging through "the god delusion" by richard dawkins, thanks in no small measure to spending too much time on jwd.
anyway, at lunch today i read dawkins, simple, elegant, somewhat embarrasing definition of faith:.
belief without evidence.
-
Shazard
-
11
Watchtower Value Destruction
by WTWizard increation of value is what makes society work.
those who create value enhance life for everyone, and often make life possible.
the assembly line, the internet, and supermarkets are all incidents where value creation has made things easier for everyone.. now, take an organization like the watchtower society.
-
Shazard
My 0.02 $ after admitting that this is good post.
When you ask JW about all goods we have in possesion specially in Western culture which no doubt has be shaped by Satan System, JW are bound to go into contradiction. There are two possibilities
1. All inventors of Goods were not Satan agents but latent JWs but it can be prooven wrong, so we have to conclude #2
2. Satan is able to CREATE, which bluntly flies into face of name of Jehovah which by its core meaning is Creator
Reasoning #2
Satan is bound by God's will and used as tool with all his agents for good of Gods ppl - JW, this leads to contradiction
It means that God has bound Satan before Millenium and thus JW teaching is wrong and Christians are right by stating that Jesus really has all the power on the Earth and in Heaven last 2000 years allready!
Other thing is that by this scenario God makes Satan ppl look better and more CreatorLike then God's ppl themselves as we do not know any major values JW have created, but we can name meny meny major values Christians and even Atheists and Pagans (Islam) have created. -
12
they left words out of NWT ....
by grewupJWnoselfesteem78-95 inthey left the words "of me" completly out of john 14:15 please verify .................................... i have more ....... .
-
Shazard
But ofcourse! You can't say that Jesus have to be prayed to! Also what about John 1:18 I have no NWT, so check it out!
-
21
Jehovah Witness and honesty
by megaflower ini spent 20 long years in the society.
the one thing they pounded into your head esp at convention time is honesty.
jehovah's people are the most honest in all the earth.
-
Shazard
I will try to respond with joke.
Question: How it comes that dolphins are so smart? We hav heard so meny stories when ppl are saved from drawning when dolphins push them to the coast
Answer: Well, we never get reports from those who are pushed off shore by the same dolphins! -
8
Pharaohs heart? - NWT or NKJV
by evergreen inin exodus 4 vs 21 according to the nkjv god told moses that "i will harden pharaohs heart, so that he will not let the people go".. also exodus 7:3 "and i will harden pharaohs heart, and multiply my signs and wonders in the land of egypt".. these scriptures seem to suggest in nkjv that god purposely hardened pharaohs heart, which would in turn allow him to bring about the plagues in egypt so that the world would know that he was the true god of the earth.. yet, reading the nwt the same scriptures read - ex 4:21 "as for me, i shall let his heart become obstinate;.
ex 7:3 "as for me, i shall let his heart become obstinate, and i shall certainly multiply my signs and my miricles in the land of eygpt".
thus giving the impression that, that god would simply allow pharaoh to stubbornly refuse the israelites to leave eygpt.
-
Shazard
My pastor explained this (and He is one of the best Latvian hebrew scholars) with parable. It is like puting cup with water outside in winter. It frozes into ice, but freezing is not activated by one who puts him outside, but because of default state of things! It is like God removes his grace from Pharaon and consequence is immidiate - Pharaons heart becomes hard. So actually cause of his hearthardening is Pharaons evil soul, but this becames possible when God removes his grace! Most important lesson here is that it is not WILL of God to make ppl evil. But sometimes he uses evil ppl to demonstrate what sin is! He is free to do so, as law allows to punish sinner. It is grace of God which renders sinners alive, not some law or our quality! And actually the thing is terrible fact, that God can kill you by removing his grace and you will die in your heart in your sin and consequence for others to see will be your evil deeds against God thus prooving that God was rigth in diagnosing your sin!
-
18
The "bodily reserrection of Christ" doctrine again falls apart under Bible.
by booker-t ini had once posted on this board that i have been talking to a born-again christian co-worker of mine on the subject of the bodily reserrection of christ doctrine.
i just cannot believe how satan has totally blinded the minds of people with regards to this doctrine.
i have tried just about everything and showed my co-worker every verse that totally destroys the bodily reserrection of christ doctrine (sometimes called the bodily reserrection doctrine) i know the problem is that born-again christians have to hold onto this doctrine because of another false doctrine they teach the "trinity" to explain away scriptures that clearly show jesus is not and has never been equal to jehovah.
-
Shazard
And this is JW reasoning? Common guys, you can't be serious about it! If this is JW reasoning then you evend don't have to know much Bible to tear apart JW with such reasoning! Let alone sentecne that Angels are superior to man... Where does this comes from? Which of them are made in the image of God? Angels or Men? Which of them are servant spirits send to serve for those who gains salvation. Common... give me such easy JW, why they don't come to me?
-
8
The Gospel and JW
by My Struggle inover the past month i have been helping out at a church on a discipleship series on jw.
the point was to have someone there to teach the members jw doctrine with the end goal of them being able to witness to them.
4. after reading the scripture i would then ask, "if jesus said all authority has been given then does that not mean that he had power when he spoke this?
-
Shazard
Task of Christian when witnessing to JW is first give your own testimony, there is no scripture against it. Second, seed doubts, put truth in their hearts and it will grow slowly but in meny meny years. Give only one or two unanswerable questions... Nice places are Isa 6 with John 12:40- (if I am not mistaking) and Heb 1:8-10 with corresponding psalm. When you show only these two scriptures which prooves that Jesus is OT Jehovah, they will have the seed planted... ofcourse they will reject it in the same tone they allways do, but it is not your taks to convert them in doorstep. Do not protect truth, just release it and it will rage itself. Do not protect lion, let it out of cage and he will protect you!
-
27
Should we unbelievers respect your faith? Warning another video!
by 5go ini can not say it better.. .
-
Shazard
Hellrider... 00.07 he says, that he does not get it coz he has no calculatiosns, so... if he does not get it and there is no math for some part of reality, then it is discardable? This boils down to "If I am lame to understand it, it is lame thing"... exactly my position on Chemistry in School 00:53 He argues against "unviersal morality" and still is talking from position of such a morality - if that is not doubletalk then what is? 01:07 Incorrect definition of what is "faith" or in other words why should I buy his definitio? 01:13 His argumetn about faith being act of will. Let him (or you) try to believe in fairy tales, in christianity (assuming you are atheist) in Hinduism or Islam... DO IT and PROOVE that it is act of will and you will fail. So no arguments here! You can pretend you believe, pretention is act of will, but real faith and beleive is beyond will! REJECTION is act of will, acceptance is not! I reject atheism and all other forms of faith by will, but Christianity I do accept not by will but as Gift. And atheists too can reject anything but they can't perform act of will to start believieng something they don't believe. Faith is not function of Will. Will is function of your belief system! 01:18 "Without evidence you have no reason to believe". Again missrepresented meaning of "believe and faith". Also "evidence" is fuzzy word. I guess the dude assumes that "evidence" is something corresponding to claims of philosophical naturalism. SEZ WHO? Evidence is fuzzy word and meaning depends on context. And more, there is meny reasons to believe, problem is that the Dude does not accept the evidence but we do. So if your predisposition is to reject any proof that England is there, you will not be able to proove it, there does not exist evidence of England if I don't want to believe it! See - rejection is act of will! 01:50 Well... so what... Philosophical Naturalism defines every action of atheism and view of it. So why this should be the universal source of morality? SEZ WHO? 02:21 So if we left children for themselve sthey would grow up more moral? Proove? If we would let atheists to teach our children, then what morality they would teach if they by definition rejects existence of absolute morality? Why he wants to teach my children? Because he does not like the fact that my view on reality differs from his view, only because I reject his views and evidence? So what? He rejects my! So is he OK with teaching my children and I will teach his children? 02:30 So we should protect our children from horrors of reality? Well how about shutting down Hollywod first? 04:01 So whay should I care what HE is saying if he does not care what I say? 04:12 Yea right, then he does not have a clue what it means to walk the way of God, how eazy it is to live in constant chocies of morality and what is wrong and what is not. I would say it is Atheism which lies out everything in perfectly simple way - do what you want to do and let others to do what they want to do! No morality, no standards... and if anyone does not agree with this, he is immoral infantile! Yea right! Whatever :) 04:18 He wished... Interesting that exactly Christians at the Dawn of modern science was the ones who lifted they brains and even more - let them down for burning to give us modern science. I know I know that argument, that in middleages there all were christians, only thing is that atheists reject simple historical facts that Newton, Pascal etc. really were believers... and by this dudes definition... wer infantile unrespectable idiots who does not to have to lift a single brain cell! Well... that I guess tells something about this guy! 04:28 Cuts in both directions. I would add. NOT Believing in something does not make it wanish from reality! 04:44 Problem, he wants evidence in his Paradigm! But as I told if you don't want to believe then there is no evidence you will! Rejection is act of will! 04:55 The same... pleas do not ask me to not mock your beliefs and stupidity! :)
-
27
Should we unbelievers respect your faith? Warning another video!
by 5go ini can not say it better.. .
-
Shazard
Tipical doubletalk of atheist. Would tear appart him in 2 minutes even without introducing religion! Poore guy!
-
25
Famous JW's
by jwfacts ini have updated my page on famous jws.
it is by far the most viewed part of my site.
it seems michelle rod, and michael jackson are far more popular searches than 1914 or jehovah.. i still need to add some quotes that identify each individual as a jw, but i thought you may enjoy the list.
-
Shazard
Interesting, that there is lack of ppl from fields where critical thinking is essence - science anyone? Prominent old Greek linguists? Mathematicans? Physicans? Chemistry masters?