Thanks, Leolaia, for continuing this thread for lurkers.
That the WT completely botched their research about the cross being used as the instrument of Jesus' death was the final straw for me; I quit the JWs for good after researching this issue for myself.
Of course I'm not convinced Jesus even existed.
But that's another issue. Whatever Jesus allegedly died on is not really all that relevant to the discussion; the undeniable fact is that celebrated Watchtower scholars have deliberately mishandled references and others' research. Lipsius is clearly misused. This dogmatic assertion:
*** Rbi8 p. 1578 5C "Torture Stake" *** Evidence is, therefore, completely lacking that Jesus Christ was crucified on two pieces of timber placed at right angles.
... is completely and utterly stupid. And, even Rolf Furuli agrees that "torture stake" is an untenable translation, grammatically speaking. Edited to add: Deut 21 says the person who dies on the tree is to be accursed, not the tree itself. So why does the WT use this as evidence?
***
w50 11/1 p. 427 Was Christ Hung on a Cross? ***Says the celebrated Jewish authority, Moses Mai·mon´i·des, of the 12th century: ‘They never hang upon a tree which clings to the soil by roots; but upon a timber uprooted, that it might not be an annoying plague: for a timber upon which anyone has been hanged is buried; that the evil name may not remain with it and people should say, "This is the timber on which so-and-so was hanged." So the stone with which anyone has been stoned; and the sword, with which the one killed has been killed; and the cloth or mantle with which anyone has been strangled; all these things are buried along with those who perished.’ (Apud Casaub. in Baron. Exercitat. 16, An. 34, Num. 134
Scholar, was Jesus entombed with that telephone pole? (This question is mine; I can't decolor my text for some reason.)