I reported to jury duty last week and it couldn't have come at one of the worst weeks for me but I was able to get out of serving after one day (I'm a full-time student so that was my excuse). Actually I would like to serve as a juror at least once and feel that I could be fair and impartial.
The whole process was based on being judged by one's peers which supposedly gives the defendent and plantiff an advantage. Frankly from what I observed of many of the potential jurors last week, I wouldn't want most of them judging me. It's quite frightening actually.
I agree that jury duty should be assigned to those who truly want to perform that function. The problem is that if it becomes optional or volunteer based, some states won't have enough people to serve. I also feel that courts need to better compensate those who serve. NY pays jurors $40.00 per day and NJ pays the same but only after the 3rd day. Prior to that, NJ pays $5.00 per day. Money talks and the average person would probably want to serve if there was adequate financial compensation.
What rules of jd or the process don't you agree with?
Best,
NYCkid