some months ago i heard that hillary will be drafted as president at the democratic convention.
well, this is no longer a rumor.
on the hannity & colmes show last night, foxnews, this 'rumor' was confirmed to be true.. the reason for the public silence (not told on the show) but by the rumor mill, is to keep hillary on a low profile, not to create a public stir.
Hillary won't enter this year unless she believes she has got an easy way back into the White House. She couldn't handle the massive defeat she has awaiting her now.
Just because New Yorkers were dumb enough to elect her doesn't mean the rest of the country is.
saddam's palace may be new u.s. embassy
- 12-12-2003. u.s. bombs never hit saddam hussein's grandiose presidential palace in baghdad, making its ample meeting rooms and vast conference tables an ideal headquarters for u.s.-led occupation authorities after the war.
[ by jim krane, associated press writer .
Maybe it would be better to award Halliburton another multi-billion dollar contract to build a new embassy? Would that appease the left?
the final declaration of principles enshrined the ideals of the conference.
the associated action plan set the goal of connecting 50% of the world's population by 2015, without going into the specifics of how to achieve it.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/technology/3314921.stm.
What else should we expect from the UN? Porn and spam is everyone's right, freedom isn't
i'm new to portland and to this forum...would like to correspond, maybe do coffee?
40ish swf
Took ya long enough to get this going again. Let my beer get warm and the pizza turn rubbery
i'm new to portland and to this forum...would like to correspond, maybe do coffee?
40ish swf
Dave's pic alone provides a bucket-load of material. LOL
LOL, wait til you actually meet him
Personally, I'm getting a kick out of you youngins calling each other old, makes us older farts really laugh.
i'm new to portland and to this forum...would like to correspond, maybe do coffee?
40ish swf
This is getting good. I getting out my lawn chair, beer and pizza to watch this.
Bisous, Lew has been here all along tonight. I am Lew
for everyone's convenience, i've summarized my synthesis into a short number of postulates.
please tell me which of my propositions are provably false and therefore biblically inadmissible.. the godhead is a heavenly trio of three living persons: the father, the son, and the holy spirit (matthew 28:19, 3:13-17, 2 corinthians 13:14, ephesians 4:4-6, 1 peter 1:2 and revelation 1:4,5).the father is all the fullness of the godhead bodily, and is invisible to mortal sight.the son is all the fullness of the godhead manifested (colossians 2:9 cf.
john 1:1).
I think the point is that the Son and the Father are both "the only true God" (cf. John 1:1).
If that were really the point, how can Jesus say another is the only true God? Only implies one of a kind. If he had said "we" maybe you could claim that point, but he didn't. If you have a son and a father both claiming to be God, then it can't be "you, the only true God," but rather, "we, the only true Gods." To claim such totally denies the concept of only one God.
John 1:1 as interpreted in pro-trinitarian versions is very suspect since no language allows one to be with themselves as also stated in John 1:1. Hence, many versions interpret it not as God or a god, but as divine and godlike.
A book I would suggest for you is The Doctrine of the Trinity, Christianity's Self Inflicted Wound, 1998 by Anthony Buzzard and Charles Hunting.
i'm new to portland and to this forum...would like to correspond, maybe do coffee?
40ish swf
Give him hell, Bisous. Good to see a young lady that can hold her own
Craig, and everybody else in the area, what say we talk about another trash Lews house right after the first of the year? Maybe I'll even make that baked ziti for you and Katie this time
i'm new to portland and to this forum...would like to correspond, maybe do coffee?
40ish swf
Dave's alright, (when he's sleeping, tied to his bed, in his straight jacket.)
There are actually quite a few ex's in the area, on both sides of the river, Bisous.
Craig, I'm looking for my refinance on the house to close soon, maybe we can all get together to celebrate then. LOL, it's as good an excuse as any other. Too bad the weather isn't cooperating for another backyard event, more room.
for everyone's convenience, i've summarized my synthesis into a short number of postulates.
please tell me which of my propositions are provably false and therefore biblically inadmissible.. the godhead is a heavenly trio of three living persons: the father, the son, and the holy spirit (matthew 28:19, 3:13-17, 2 corinthians 13:14, ephesians 4:4-6, 1 peter 1:2 and revelation 1:4,5).the father is all the fullness of the godhead bodily, and is invisible to mortal sight.the son is all the fullness of the godhead manifested (colossians 2:9 cf.
john 1:1).
If Jesus plainly states another is the only true God by praying to him and stating such, who do you believe? I choose to believe Jesus himself.
