Drew Sagan posted:
Don't let them jump the topic and start telling you about how "clean" they were back then, or that they were the only people that had the truth. Focus on dates! They most likely will say stuff like "we were the only ones right about the trinity, immortal soul, ect" and that is why God chose us.
1914/1918/1919 does everything for the Watchtower, but what exactly would an all powerful god need such confusing dates for?
When sticking to dates, if he attempts to go on with the presentation on how they came to 1914, would this be the time to mention 586/587, or wait a week and 'do some research?'
I am really hoping my wife is present when we talk about this, I want it to be a jumping off point to a 'Captives of a Concept' type discussion....
Would this also be a time to mention that there are still Bible Students today who were believing the same exact things as the folks who are now JWs.....and these folks in many cases are much more rigidly in line with what was 'inspected' in 1918/1919.
PrimateDave posted:
Since no dates as we know them are to be found in the Bible, the only reliable and universally agreed upon date between JWs and the secular world is the conquest of Babylon in 539 BCE. Then you have to use the Watchtower CD to list the Babylonian kings and the duration of their reigns to show that it was not possible for Nebuchadnezzar to destroy Jerusalem in 607 BCE. The so-called Gentile times prophecy based on Nebuchadnezzar's dream is a pretty flimsy construct. Very few Witnesses are able to explain it even.
Isn't this the KISS approach that I believe it was AlleyMom had posted.....
Is the Isiah book on the WT CD??