Haaaaa Haaaaa Haaaaa Haaaaaa Haaaaaa!!!
That's all.
anyone read the report book on this website: .
http://www.livingwatersforum.com/bcommentary/index.php .
yadda
Haaaaa Haaaaa Haaaaa Haaaaaa Haaaaaa!!!
That's all.
...when your heart is broken????.
i can't make you love me: by bonnie raitt.
turn down the lights, turn down the bed.
I'll listen to Philly soul like the Delfonics and the Stylistics.
I'd adopt thirdwitness so I can whoop his ass everytime he disagrees!
after being turned down for 6, i finally got an apt.
that my kids and i are very happy in.
i didn't have internet connection for a week and my grades in college dropped a bit but they said not to worry too much because my grades has been very good and that it won't matter too much.
I know that feeling Froggie. Sincere congratulations.
contrary to what some apologists say!
What's sad is that it's actually bad news.
often i hear jws claim that people leave the borg because they cannot follow the rules, implying that anyone who leaves lacks character, self control, and/or moral values.. often i hear jwd posters--me included--say the myriad of rules in the borg is one of (not the only) reason they would not follow the org.
virgochick said it well in the "how do you feel about the name j----?
" thread:.
Only man would enforce such laws. A loving God would understand our situation and understand that He made us like this. He gave us the ability to reason. He made us imperfect. (yes, he did, because I don't except the Adam and Eve story where one sin screwed us all. Right this second there is a baby with flies on his face, screaming in pain and starving to death. Tell HIM that it's because someone ate the wrong apple. Go ahead and tell him that and if he makes it to an adult he'll murder you for being so stupid and insulting his lot in life.)
When God tells me what to do, I'll do it. If He was so loving and He was actually out there, why not give us 2 seconds of His time, open up the heavens and say "My children, I am here." A loving God would do that for us and not make us rely on imperfect humans for the key to salvation. As for me and my household, we shall serve who we know loves us. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?
it broke my heart to read about someone having to paying court fee's after wining a sexual abuse case against the wtbts.
she ended up winning 5,000 dollars but has to pay 220000 dollars in court feee to wtbts and for her lawyer.
crazy!.
Wouldn't a second witness to child molestation be considered a child molester? What would this person say, "Oh yes, I was there, I watched the entire thing. Yep, call the cops, he's guilty. By the way, I did nothing wrong. I did my spiritual duty and came forward to help the victim and do the right thing. I'm not a molester, I just like to watch."
Hey 3rd, I asked you respectfully to show me a couple things and with those answers you know what questions are next. It is not logical to answer a question when it is obvious this answer raises new questions, very obvious to me and you. It's being deceptive and it is hard to believe someone when they have been deceptive to me.
I thought you were a 'scholar', and I'm not being sarcastic, I just thought there would be a better explanation for something so important. It's no little thing. I think you have been backed in to a corner on this one.
One more thing-----if it's Bible law, as you say, to use this rule, doesn't it make you question the Bible? Not even the entire thing, just questioning the fact that in today's world maybe not EVERY SINGLE LITTLE WORD in the Bible should be blindly followed.
Man wrote the Bible. Maybe the light is getting brighter. Yes, it says it was inspired by God, but has there ever been a case where man was inspired by God and they had to change what they originally wrote due to times changing and lights brightening? Remember this time is not saying "Oh, that was like 50 years ago! Yes we said those things, but that's a long time ago." It's actually saying "Oh that was like 2,000 years ago, but that's a long time ago." Wouldn't that second saying be just as justified if not more due to the amount of time the light has had to brighten?
Would changing inspired word be wrong? Please help, I'm confused.
the wts claims that it is the true christian religion but it obviously isn't, it is a heartless business more than anything else.
but how do imagine the true religion to be?
it obviously should be very spiritual but how exactly is this to be manifested in its life?
The only way to have a perfect church would be to remove the people. But then it ceases to be a church, so maybe the only way is to stay at home and study on your own with a bible and a few prayers.
http://www.carm.org/jw/mental.htm .
pretty interesting, i thought i'd show ya's..
The Spencer article has been throroughly discredited. Beckford pointed out at the time that the methodology is flawed because Spencer failed to properly distinguish between active and marginal members. Even Penton noted that the language is clearly hostile to Jehovah's Witnesses and the ratios unreliable.
Slim
I'm sure you're right. But would the numbers be that off? Just from general observation it's pretty clear that there are more mental problems at the hall than at the mall.--IMO
It's like questioning someone who said urine tastes bad. Maybe they have never tasted it but it's safe to say he is correct.--IMO
http://www.carm.org/jw/mental.htm .
pretty interesting, i thought i'd show ya's..
Speaking of crazy JW's-------
Tuesday February 7, 2006 | Printer friendly version | Email to a friend |
By Hilary White
LifeSiteNews.com) ? The UK?s mania for political correctness has struck again where a school has banned hot cross buns, a traditional sweet pastry associated with Good Friday. A representative of Oaks Primary School in Ipswich, said the buns, which include two strips of decorative icing intersecting in the middle, might offend Jehovah?s Witnesses who attend the school.
Hot cross buns, a spicy currant or raisin studded yeast bun, topped with a "Cross" of lemon-flavored icing, have been a feature of English culture since the Middle Ages.
The Suffolk Evening Star reported that the head teacher of the school, Tina Jackson, asked the supplier to provide the buns without the crosses. ?Obviously, the hot cross bun is a celebration of Easter but it is not Easter yet,? she told the paper. Jackson did not say whether she would expel students who chanted the traditional English nursery rhyme, ?One a penny; two a penny; hot cross buns.?
The local pastor of the Jehovah?s Witness congregation applauded the school?s decision. ?I can understand why the school has done this and I support the decision. Hot cross buns are a pagan symbol of fertility no different to bunnies, eggs and Easter. The Bible states we should not worship things of a pagan origin.?
No information was available about what sort of services the school had been planning to allow students to worship the buns or whether they had been cancelled. Moreover, the school did not say whether the buns would be inspected by the local Muslim of Catholic authorities for possible accidental appearances of religious figures in the patterns formed by the currants in the buns.
Contact info for the school:
The Oaks Community Primary
01473 684994
Aster Rd
Ipswich, IP2 0NR, United Kingdom
Click here for a recipe for hot cross buns: