This is a great thread. The opinions all bring up many great points. We don't really
know what the future of WTS will be, but I will add my agreement on many points made.
The GB allows upwardly mobile members to succeed only by total agreement with
current doctrined and support for it.
Rutherford did totally reform the WTS and allowed it to be adaptable from then on, no
really major reform has taken place since then, only adapting. The changes that took
place in 1995 were necessary adaptations. Many other changes are the result of
lawsuits, government rules, and the pocketbook. (No matter what we might say, the
pocketbook is the ultimate guide to what should be done.)
My opinion is that the WTS will remain as firm and radical as it can be to be attractive
to people looking for that. They won't be able to outrun the information superhighway,
so their membership drives will become less effective. Eventually, they will try to adapt
their stand on issues to increase membership and decrease people quitting the org., but
their adaptations will be too little, too late, they won't work.
All theories from that point on will be just guesses. The corporation may survive without
the GB influence and become something else. The GB may continue to downsize and
hold out for the "end" doing any radical last-minute efforts to stay alive, including
abandoning the United States entirely and finding a new place to take their remaining
millions.