Haven't they already covered themselves by instituting a new policy recently regarding who witnessed those who
witnessed the events of 1914 ?
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
...but since neither of these long-lived ladies were witnesses, jehovah would have destroyed them anyway.
may they rest in peace.
monday, december 21, 2009.
Haven't they already covered themselves by instituting a new policy recently regarding who witnessed those who
witnessed the events of 1914 ?
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
need some advise.
my friend has been with her boyfriend for almost 4 years, and for 3 of them the sex has been getting less and less.
they are down to around twice a year.
There are so many possible answers to why this relationship is in a mode of failure,
one being that perhaps he's a fellow that has discovered his own innate homosexuality
that has to be hidden and undisclosed for the sake of his relationship that he's involved in now.
If this guy is healthy in body and mind, there would be strong suggestion there is indeed a problem
of sorts. From all evidence of men who watch porn on their computers and are married, in doing so
they get sexually excited and look for their partners for sex, if the person is actually masturbating while
watching porn this could be the reason for not looking for their partners sexual attention.
Relationships that become divided and are fractured to some degree are another reason for a lack
of sexual intimacy in the bedroom. The suggestion being, that the couple argue most of the time and
they really don't enjoy being in ones company, then the suggestion of sex and love making occurs and this regression
outside of the bedroom continues itself right into the bedroom.
There is probably alot of information you can grab off of the inter-net on the subject if
you spend a little searching.
so i heard an interview with the "black eyed peas" who mention they jammed with prince at his home recently, only to have one excited member yell to prince....."your the sh#t man!
" well how would a witness react to that????
a staff member later told them prince did not like swearing in his house.
Prince is trying to revert what the media used call him the little dirty one, he's still a little dirty one though,
but now with righteous glaze over himself.
The little dirt one has engaged himself with a little dirty religion in a attempt to make him look clean and pure.
Thats an irony in itself.
i have a new take on the 587/586 "controversy".
this is of course, speaking for me over 3 years after i left.
i realize that if you are first leaving, this is a big deal.
Nebuchadnezzar didn't come into power until 605 BCE, but I would suppose the WTS would
disregard that fact as well. There has been more archaeological evidence to when the destruction of Jerusalem occurred
since the known information of Russell and Rutherford times, will the WTS accept that is highly unlikely since it would destroy
their 1914 doctrine to smithereens, making themselves appear ignorant and unreliable.
They have built up this organization/kingdom on lies and ignorance by their own design, they have
therefore a forthright agenda to keep what they have achieved.
One thing to learn from all of this is, religions who have made strong pronouncements
involving their own self constructed doctrines, will hardly ever revert their position
revealing their own created diverse ignorance. Religions such as the JWS operate and sell themselves
on creating an illusion that they are unique and have special status among other religions.
To make a move in changing vital doctrine would crack and break open this illusion.
There seems to be an enormous amount of information now through archaeological findings regarding when
ancient Jerusalem was invaded by Nebuchadnezzar that give evidence to the 586 BCE date. Will
the leaders of the WTS. ever confirm that themselves, I hardly doubt it, they aren't really concerned
about the truth or facts per-say , instead they're only concerned about up holding the truths that
they themselves created in developing their organization.
In effect religions taint the truth to support and serve themselves.
so i heard an interview with the "black eyed peas" who mention they jammed with prince at his home recently, only to have one excited member yell to prince....."your the sh#t man!
" well how would a witness react to that????
a staff member later told them prince did not like swearing in his house.
Thats hilarious coming from a guy who during his half time show at the super bowl, made a posturing pose
with his guitar like he has a big dick. Now thats what I call vulgar, specially with millions of children watching that show.
I guess its hard to be a fag when you don't want to be one.
http://picasaweb.google.ca/lh/photo/ham3xekhiuhvf1chdvda_q?authkey=gv1srgck2uh4hl39u7_we&feat=embedwebsite"><img.
Shortly after that picture was taken the GB members did a video together its actually quite good .
did you use wt dates as well as things found from a secular perspective?
if a witness was researching the 607 dates strictly from watchtower info, would it still become clear they are wrong?
or does the wtbs *make* the dates add up...?
Its interest phenomena when people will lie and perjury themselves for the sake of other liars.
Isn't religion grand ?
I had to laugh when he used the term celebrated scholars of the Watchtower society.
The noted scholars of the WTS are only concerned about using information that
supports their own devised doctrines, which isn't too surprising since their organizational kingdom
would crumble and the money and support would falter.
So once again the truth of the Watchtower publishing corruption is not really the truth,
but rather corporate marketing corruption.
1. obviously the original blood doctrine from the 1950'-1970's banned all blood products of any sort causing many deaths.
{latter revised due to bad publicity and many deaths}.
2. organ transplants are banned till 1980.
I've known of children beaten continuously by parents who took the literal word of god of
Children who disobeyed their parents should be beaten with a rod.
This gave many JWS parents, mainly fathers the go head to beat their children harshly,
this wasn't just done only for the child's sake but to confirm the mans position in the household.
Growing up as a JWS I witnessed quite a few instances of brutality by fathers who
were being faithful to this destructive social behavior.
I guess trying to emulate 2000 year old social morals from the ancient Israelites and their values
is indeed damaging and counter productive.
did you use wt dates as well as things found from a secular perspective?
if a witness was researching the 607 dates strictly from watchtower info, would it still become clear they are wrong?
or does the wtbs *make* the dates add up...?
This been brought up before Georgiegirl, but being a long time JW myself he does expresses himself
with what typical JWS would think and say, that being so it would lead the conclusion that he is indeed
a JW apologetic with all the ingrained mind controlling factions.
did you use wt dates as well as things found from a secular perspective?
if a witness was researching the 607 dates strictly from watchtower info, would it still become clear they are wrong?
or does the wtbs *make* the dates add up...?
One thing to learn from all of this is, religions who have made strong pronouncements
involving their own self constructed doctrines, will hardly ever revert their position
revealing their own created diverse ignorance. Religions such as the JWS operate and sell themselves
on creating an illusion that they are unique and have special status among other religions.
To make a move in changing vital doctrine would crack and break open this illusion.
There seems to be an enormous amount of information now through archaeological findings regarding when
ancient Jerusalem was invaded by Nebuchadnezzar that give evidence to the 586 BCE date. Will
the leaders of the WTS. ever confirm that themselves, I hardly doubt it, they aren't really concerned
about the truth or facts per-say , instead they're only concerned about up holding the truths that
they themselves created in developing their organization.
In effect religions taint the truth to support and serve themselves.