It depends on the purpose of it being up there. The timing sucks, for one thing.
If the purpose of printing these articles, and of placing them on the webpage, is to 'prove' to the world that this is the way Jehovah's Witnesses are, then it is blatant hypocrisy.
____________________________________________________________________
On the other hand notice this quote: "Some 4,000 years ago, the cities of Sodom and Gomorrah were famous for depravity. Pedophilia was apparently among the region's many vices. Genesis 19:4 describes a sex-crazed mob of Sodomites ranging "from boy to old man" seeking to rape Lot's two male guests.<
Consider: Why would mere boys be inflamed with the idea of raping males? Clearly they had already been introduced to homosexual perversions.<
This is a blatant and flagrant lie. Watchtower has been taking a lot of flak for this, and to put this up on a public webpage at this time is no less than inflammatory.
The Bible says no such thing. This doctrine that 'this is what the Bible says' has long ago been proved to not be properly translated into English (and Watchtower made it even worse by translating from the incorrect English into incorrect languages to boot.)
_____________________________________________________________________
And did you notice this quote:
>Some legal experts advise reporting the abuse to the authorities as soon as possible. In some lands the legal system may require this. But in other places the legal system may offer little hope of successful prosecution.<
This is the ONLY reference to reporting abusers to authorities. Is there some reason this is totally BURIED in part of a paragraph on this whole webpage? And why 'some legal experts'? Is there ANY legal expert that would NOT advise (or want) abusers reported to authorities? Is the Watchtower trying to say by default that medical authorities DON'T want abusers reported? Or that SOCIETY doesn't want them reported to authorities?
___________________________________________________________________
Thsoe articles are extrememely outdated, do not meet the needs of Society and children today, don't begin to adequately protect children, they contain material that is misleading and inflammatroy and should never have been placed on this website at this time.
And if you want support, notice how you have to DIG to get the dates of these articles? Why is that?
Why is the WATCHTOWER dealing with pedophilia in the Watchtower publishing company not up on its website?
I'll tell you why. Even the WATCHTOWER realizes how inflammatory and bad publicity THAT article is.
UADNA-US (Unseen Apostate Directorate of North America-United States)