Here's the first article I read on this - http://www.stuff.co.nz/4588472a11.html
It says, "But a church elder
who knew of his history interrupted Valentine speaking to a young boy in the toilets during a service."
It does not say the elder reported him to anyone.
It does say, "Valentine reported the incident to his probation officer ..." and that "Valentine attended the church under supervision to help with his rehabilitation ..."
It does not say who was 'supervising' him or why his 'supervisor' was not with him in the bathroom.
I am also curious why the parents of this child allowed him to go to the bathroom by himself with a known child molester attending meeting. Perhaps the congregation was not notified of what was going on????
Sorry to be a wet blanket and I so hope changes/improvements are being made. From these articles in this case I just can't see it yet.