I didn't see mention of the shunning the GB imposes on followers who persist
in criticizing any of the 12 or so distinctive GB policies. I was stumped at
first when I realized the JWs who came to my place didn't double check the
distinctive GB claims at the library, and the leader of the group wouldn't even
look at the research material I gathered about them, till afterward when I
learned the GB policy to keep their customers afraid of being shunned by friends
and family.
Discouraging higher ed goes back to Russell and Rutherford, even before the
harsh shunning policies, for the same reason. Knowing they were sending follow-
ers door to door the leaders took care to discourage higher ed. Early on, Rus-
sell encouraged friends to shun Marie, and Rutherford encouraged followers to
shun Walter F. Salter. As the group grew in size and controversy the followers
were required to abide by general policy to shun those who caught on to the
leaders and complained.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Franklin_Rutherford#Doctrinal_changes
I accept a choice about basic faith understood as such but I draw the line at
misinformation and harm. Anyone might be fooled by Popoff's radio receiver gim-
mick (GB blood policy, etc.), meant to affect distinction, into throwing away
life saving meds (refusing medical treatment of blood/major blood products). I
recommend holding up the "radio receivers," always there for GB claims of dis-
tinction, for a secular audience of believers and non-believers.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Popoff
The followers are victims, sometimes of the shunning policy, so I don't feel
like further victimizing them and calling them stupid, which might be taken for
a cranky editorial from any of the stances. I'd rather hold up the radio re-
ceivers and emphasize that it's all the more apparent that the GB uses them in
how they do all they can to keep their customers in the dark about them.