Well, it's been a really long day at work and I'm just getting home. There have been a lot of excellent points raised on this thread, and I'll try to address as many of them as possible.
They really do think God is running the organization. As such, trying to explain things in a rational way is not productive, IMHO.
I think that's true when it comes to doctrinal matters, but they've certainly acted rationally when their self-preservation was at stake such as in the change in their pedophile policy post Catholic Church scandal and their allowance of blood fractions in response to pressure from European govts.
There were groups that were leaving the JW's and organizing. My old congregation of Carnarsie, Brooklyn, had over 60 DF'd for apostasy.
However in my congregation we were experiencing a 'Berean' period around that time. I went from 3 Saturdays a month concentrating on being good organizationally to be concerned about not being followers of men, discerning the context and taking in accurate knowledge so that when the end did come we were not led astray.
There were several others at Bethel questioning things, and many in the congregations. But most of this was due to the failure of 1975. The hard liners of the GB were convinced the sky was falling,
This is kind of what I'm getting at. It seems to me that the threat the GB perceived went far beyond Ray and Ed's penchant for independent thinking. Their actions were those of men who perceived a palpable threat to their authority. CoC doesn't really delve into it, but it seems to me that there was far too much independent thought throughout the organization as far as the Society was concerned, and Ray, Ed, and the rest of the purged Bethelites were simply made examples of in order to put fear into the hearts of those who dared challenge official policy.
Try these links:
Thanks, Randy. I'll read them when I get a chance.
My own personal opinion is that Ray's primary motivation in writing CoC was to tell his side of the story. His reputation was sullied as pernicious rumors about him were allowed to circulate throughout the JW ranks. If his primary interest was pecuniary, he could have very easily made sensational claims that would have gotten the attention of those outside the XJW community, but he didn't. In fact, he mentions in his book that a former high-ranking memeber of the Society had been admonished for homesexual propensities (edward chitty?), but he declines to go into details. His book has all the marks of a honest-hearted attempt to write a memoir of his experiences within the JW religion.
That being said, he, like anyone of us, is incapable of being truly impartial. Regardless of how hard we may try to avoid it, bias seeps into our memories and the way in which we perceive ourselves and the events around us. That's why we cannot have a complete picture of what went on without hearing accounts from some of the others involved. I would love to read Albert Schroeder's memoir or the recollections of Lyman Swingle or Fred Franz, but of course, that was never going to happen. We should be thankful for Ray's memoir, but we shouldn't fall into the trap of viewing it as gospel.