From here on in I'm on the side that will assume the WTBTS is guilty until it can be proven otherwise .
I agree.
The guilt lies in the association with the UN/DPI. In order for an NGO to gain affiliation, they must prove their organization supports the long range goals of the UN. If it can be proven the WTS is affilited with the UN/DPI, then that is proof of WTS support for the United Nations. -You shall know them by their works-
Below is part of the letter sent to the UN from the President of the org. site I manage justifying their application and entry into the UN/DPI as affiliates/associates:
There are implicit and legitimate universal spiritual and ethical value judgments applicable to all peoples underlying the foundation of the United Nations Organization. The international community will always run into difficulties in establishing the universality of basic human rights in some nations, societies and cultures unless their particular religious or secular ideologies to accept first that there are certain extraordinary experiences which suggest the same universal human values. The right of the international community to “impose” a UN “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” or “UN Millennium Development Goals” may otherwise be challenged.
Since its foundation in 1975 the international objective of the IIIHS has been to establish among leading scholars, scientists, and religious leaders from many nations the acceptance of the fact that there have been strong spiritual motivations which are common to all peoples, and cultures. These common spiritual motivations justifiably and correctly – lie behind the “Universal Declaration of Human Rights” of the United Nations, and the present movement to establish and achieve the current UN Millennium Development Goals.