the only way to go to heaven is believing that jesus christ is god's son, and that he was sent here to earth to die on the cross for our sins.
if you confess him as lord and savior, then and only then, will you be certain that you are going to heaven.
6/9 said >>>>>>>>>>> I am perfectly willing, even eager, to believe that there is one greater than myself.
My advise to you then is to go to a big time college football game. Then look around you. You will see about 50,000 such people. Most of whom do not constantly utter profanity and blaspheme God the way you do.
the only way to go to heaven is believing that jesus christ is god's son, and that he was sent here to earth to die on the cross for our sins.
if you confess him as lord and savior, then and only then, will you be certain that you are going to heaven.
Jan said >>>>>>>>>>> to insist that you are right and others are wrong, when all the evidence is against you, is the very opposite of humility.
I can't disagree with that. I will, however, add that it is also the opposite of humility to insist that "all evidence is against" there being a Creator. For only a very proud person could refuse to acknowledge any and all evidence that now exists for the existence of God.
the only way to go to heaven is believing that jesus christ is god's son, and that he was sent here to earth to die on the cross for our sins.
if you confess him as lord and savior, then and only then, will you be certain that you are going to heaven.
6/9 said >>>>>>>>> The only thing in this discussion that I'm ignorant of, is how anyone can think faith is a virtue.
To have faith in God requires a willingness to believe in one greater than yourself. That shows humility. Humility is a virtue, is it not?
I believe that those who are truly willing to believe, God gives reasons to believe. I believe to all who are not truly willing to believe, God gives reasons not to believe. Of those the Bible says, "They perish because they refused to love the truth and so be saved. For this reason God sends them a delusion so that they will believe the lie and so that all will be condemned who have not believed the truth but have delighted in wickedness." (2 Thes. 2:10-12)
hillary,.
in another thread you described your understandings of the new testament as being those of a "preterist.
" would you please descibe what that means exactly?
I look forward to it. Have a great time.
sorry this is so long, i probably could have left out half of it.
i just felt like typing today.. the sign of the times.. i was having a semi conversation with someone whos very close to me on this subject after the 911 tragedies.
apparently some congregations were talking about it being the worst thing that has ever happened, thus being a sign of the times.
Plm,
You've got my screen name correctly understood. : )
hillary,.
in another thread you described your understandings of the new testament as being those of a "preterist.
" would you please descibe what that means exactly?
Hillary,
In another thread you described your understandings of the New Testament as being those of a "Preterist." Would you please descibe what that means exactly? As I understand it, Preterists believe that when Jesus referred to the coming end of an age and to the time he would return to judge the world, he was referring solely to events which took place during Rome's initial siege and final destruction of Jerusalem (between the years AD 66 and 70).
I believe Preterists also believe that we will all experience the return of Christ in a personal way when we meet our Maker on Judgment Day. I have also heard that Preterists believe that the book of Revelation was written before the year AD 70 and that all of its prophetic content refered to events which took place before or during that year. And they say that the thousand year reign of Christ spoken of in Revelation refers symbolically to the many years of the Church age.
Are my present understandings about Preterism correct? If not, will you please correct them for me? And will you please tell us anything else that you feel is important to know, if we are to understand the basics of Preterism? For instance, if Christ is not returning to set all things right during a thousand year reign on earth, how will all things be set right? By the efforts of Christians? Or do Preterists believe things will probably never be much different than they are now?
I look forward to your answers. Thank you.
a recent thread that touched on the chronology of the patriachs in the book of genesis triggered off a memory that i just had to uncover.
how did we ever believe such stuff!.
questions from readers the conclusion that the flood occurred 1,656 years after adams creation rests on the ages in the genealogical list in genesis chapter 5. the bible there says how old each man was when he became father to the next.
Nearly all Old Testament scholars and Bible historians understand that the men who recorded the chronological history of Judah's kings contained in the Bible used what is now referred to as the "accession year system of reckoning" for counting the number of years of a king's rule. The way this system of counting years worked was that a king's first partial calendar year as king was not counted. Then his first full calendar year as king was counted as his "first" year. And finally his last partial year of rule was counted as his last year.
The reason Bible writers counted time in this way is so they could later simply add together all the "years" of rule credited to two or more successive kings and, by so doing, arrive at the actual total number of years which passed during the period of time in question. They knew that if they had counted partial years as full years, or never counted partial years at all, they would not later be able to accurately determine exactly how many years passed during the history of their nation by adding together all the "years" which their kings ruled. So, to avoid such a problem, Bible writers who recorded Judean history always utilized the "accession year system of reckoning" when they counted time.
With these things in mind it seems quite likely that the men who wrote the Bible, for the same reasons, would have employed this same system of reckoning when, in Genesis chapters 5 and 11, they counted and recorded the numbers of years in men's lives. For a thorough discussion of this subject matter see Handbook of Bible Chronology, by Jack Finegan, and The Mysterious Numbers of the Hebrew Kings, by Edwin R. Theile.
the only way to go to heaven is believing that jesus christ is god's son, and that he was sent here to earth to die on the cross for our sins.
if you confess him as lord and savior, then and only then, will you be certain that you are going to heaven.
If they don't have the internet and oreo cookies up there I don't want to go.
questions questions im just wondering are modern day dating methods reliable i ask this because i was told there are different types of dating methods to test fossils etc for instance testing bones which using dating methods say 10 yrs ago are now classed unreliable i say this because i was told that historians dated human remains back to 20 million yrs i think and with a more modern technique it s now dated at only 5000 yrs i think so the question is can we trust todays modern dating methods or will they sometime in the near future be more accurate
Yeah, what is it with Cygnus? Isn't he the same guy who used to post pieces of substance years ago at H2O? Now, it seems like all he posts are little pieces of worthless crap. I don't get it. What happened to him? Not that I am any great source of light. I've always been more of a reader than a poster. But Cygnus used to post quality stuff I enjoyed reading. Now it's all fluff and sarcasm.
despite the apparent redundancy, i would like to introduce the subject from a different perspective.
around 1996 i came in contact with a jw pioneer named "francesco annunziata" from naples, italy.. francesco was involved with a man (inactive jw) named angelo palego, with whom he has made several expeditions to mt.
ararat searching the famous ahora gorge for remnants of the ark.. the majority of the more technical and geological/scientific information is in italian, but there is enough information posted in english to merit attention.. i posted this subject in an effort to move away from discussing the flood, size of the flood and/or location of the flood.
Come on! It's obvious to anyone that these photos are fakes. I don't believe their creators really expect or even want anyone to take them seriously. They are only putting them on their site for fun. This is just silliness. That you apparently take them seriously, or think they even expect you to, is hard to believe.
