It really depends on who you debate with, why you debate and the mutual respect you show one another.
For instance, one evening, I was talking about the steadfast faith of my mother in law who refused blood transfusion despite this putting her in greater risk. The doctor had evaluated this at 2% higher rate of failure and thereby, possible death.
My ant’s response was that there were no risks to begin with and that the doctor was inadequate. I tried to reason with her that the doctor had been referred by the Hospital Liaison Comity (HLC), that they had stayed informed every step of the way and that there was indeed an risk increase due to refusing blood.
My ant argued and argued, questioning my faith and motives for layout out the facts while all I wanted to say is:
Who has greater faith? The one who does something knowing it is totally safe or the one that does an action accepting the risks?
Somehow, she couldn’t see things from that angle and continued arguing.
Moral of the story? Some people are not worth your time.