https://instagram.com/p/zozSQlLGtx/?modal=true
That one is about being happy when you have only half a meeting. This goes on to show how much they truely appreciate their meetings!
https://instagram.com/jw_video_memes/.
https://instagram.com/p/zlaylblgo5/?modal=true.
https://instagram.com/p/zozSQlLGtx/?modal=true
That one is about being happy when you have only half a meeting. This goes on to show how much they truely appreciate their meetings!
i hated ministry book bags.i hated coming out of my home with the book bags looking like i was going to a seminar.so,i starting going to the ministry school and sunday bible meetings holding only the required books for that day in my hand.. for the sunday meetings,i would just carry the song book,bible and watchtower magazine in my hand.
no book bag!
for the ministry school,i would just carry just what necessary for the evening.
i find articles like this (click very frustrating to read.
when i read reports on how charity was delivered, i am expecting to read numbers that will give me an idea of how money was used for such relief.
unfortunately, the information provided is simply not enough to provide any ball park idea of what was actually spent.
StarTrekAngel, this is quite interesting. Is there anyone else who has heard of a "Special Relief Fund" set up on the fly for a specific disaster?
i find articles like this (click very frustrating to read.
when i read reports on how charity was delivered, i am expecting to read numbers that will give me an idea of how money was used for such relief.
unfortunately, the information provided is simply not enough to provide any ball park idea of what was actually spent.
I find articles like this (click very frustrating to read. When I read reports on how charity was delivered, I am expecting to read numbers that will give me an idea of how money was used for such relief. Unfortunately, the information provided is simply not enough to provide any ball park idea of what was actually spent.
The report states that almost 750 homes were repaired or rebuilt. “Or”? Really? Obviously, more efforts are needed to rebuild a house rather than simply repair it. How can we make an estimate of time based on this? Let’s use an example here: You are asked to know if you have enough water to fill a pool with 750 bottles of water and “5 Gallon” containers. It doesn’t make sense. The actual quantity could be anywhere between 580 to 14,214 liters!
So, let’s go with the worst possible scenario and claim that ALL 750 had to be rebuild. With a 5 days per 5 volunteers (as stated in the report), we can conclude that it would take a team of 16 volunteers to do the work in one year. Provided that they worked 5 days per week and had 4 weeks’ vacation!
So what about the 612 volunteers mentioned in the article? Obviously most of these worked for short periods of time and very for the entire length of the project.
As the article admits, most of the work was done by locales while 90 Witnesses from other countries also assisted. What did they do? How long did they stay? We don’t know.
With so little information, we may come to this pessimist conclusion:
A small amount of funds was indeed made available to the witnesses when the disaster occurred. However, most of the work and resources reported in the article has in fact been provided for by the 190 000 publishers in the Philippines. This conclusion is based on the fact that not all of the Philippinos live in poverty.
With this in mind, it would not be surprising to hear that all the donations spent on this disaster had in fact been covered by local donations within the year in their respective “World Wide Work” contribution box.
You think this conclusion is unfair? The simplest way to rebut this is to provide clear numbers: How much money did the Watchtower
1) provide for the relief effort?
2) receive in donations from the Philippines in the last 10 years?
3) spent in their preaching work in the last 10 years?
Why should we care?
Articles as this one remind to the reader that donation are also used for charity. As a result, this article links to a FAQ article named “How is the Work of Jehovah’s Witnesses Financed? In the third paragraph, the reader will notice that the first example of expense covered by the donation is “relieve victims of natural disasters”. Does the order of that list represent the order of priority for the expenses?
of these, over 2,000 were admitted to concentration camps.
1,000 died in prison and concentration camps.
another 1,000 of jehovah's witnesses died in prisons and concentration camps.".
This level of innacuracy is in large part due to the fact that an estimated 1/3 of the JW became innactive and left during the war. As a result, active JW could have thought that they had died when in fact, they had "left the truth". In that sense, it might not be far fetch to say that they had not inflated their numbers on purpose. They were likely surprised by how many people actually left instead of holding up to their beliefs.
the 2014 grand totals page has been released onto facebook.. .
.
i have started updating the statistics and graphs at jwfacts.com/watchtower/statistics.php, and will release highlights as i work through it during the rest of the day..
i certainly wouldn't.
and if the elders wanted to have a meeting with me, i would respectfully decline.
if the elders wanted to deal with you, would you talk with them?.
Yes, I would. And once the committee would be over, I would automatically appeal. I will not go out without a fight and telling them what I honestly believe. My argument would be simple: By disfellowshipping me, you are accusing me of not worshipping God anymore. I do not believe this to be true and true and would argue on it. I have been raised a JW and have given many precious years to that organization, I would take the same pleasure Jesus had by calling them hypocrites.
i cant figure out when the auntie and uncle thing started or why.
it sure is a peadophiles dream to have a kid they dont know call them uncle!
they are now in a special relationship.
I don't consider my self a witness anymore and yet, I get my kids to call my best friend "Uncle" for the simple fact that he is a brother to me. Always been there, always will.
back to august of 1988. my brother and i were the ones being marked.
at the time, my father had clued us in that it was coming and had gotten a recording of it.
are we not also obliged to act on wrongs being committed by a family member or members?
I enjoyed the reading, thank you. This shows how they use the scriptures to display a lack of love.
thanks.
summary:.
jehovahs witnesses claim to use portion of the contributions given to the world wide work funds for relief work.
unfortunately, as shown by the alberta flooding video, they seem to have a greater interest in reporting (or advertising) it than they are in actually releasing funds for such work.. introduction.
JimboJones, you have just confirmed what I have said above: The Watchtower encourages people to give financial contribution to their organization stating that they will use some of these funds for Relief work. Then, go on to produce a highly professional videos to advertise the relief work that was carried out at a local level. If they made it an habit of releasing actual funds for the relief work, then why would they have the urge to produce such a video for an event where they obviously did not assist financially?
My point is that the Organization does much less then what seems to be conveyed by the montage, words and music of the videos produced.
All those who actually did the work are without doubt good people and such actions are to be praised. My problem resides in how the Organization takes most of the credit by stating that without organizing this effort under Jehovah's spirit, the volunteers and equipment they used could not have been coordinated in such little time and have achieved the results they have.
Sentences like this let the viewer believe that the equipment was provided by the bethel, that trained experts were funded by the organization and that other organizations taking actions without Jehovah's spirit did not, or could not have come close to a similar result.
What about the sentence displayed at 1:14 :
"Jehovah's Witnesses in Canada provided both physical relief and spiritual comfort to victims of the disaster"?
With such a sentence, how could the view come to the conclusion that most of the help was essentially provided by the local community of brothers and sisters?
Such video is truly misleading as an individual could easily be pushed to give away his inheritance to a charitable Organization that, in reality, does not use its funds at it leads people to believe.