cofty:
Focus - I never atacked you.
I am certain I have never been "atacked".
If you can't see the difference between criticising what people say - and giving good reasons for those criticisms
But of course I can see such difference.
Indeed, it relates to my modus operandi. I hold those expressing views and taking actions accountable for their decisions.
making vile personal attacks on people's character then you are not very bright.
I always know - I'm quoting AlanF on this; I recently saw it on a thread on this forum - that when someone accuses Phookus (even subject to a conditional) of not being very bright, then not only must they have lost the argument, but furthermore they know they have lost it.
And pssst... the emboldened text is an ad hominem, precisely what you were decrying earlier when it was (most assuredly) committed by said VG.
"You" are just a screen anonym. It is thus technically impossible for VG to libel "you", certainly in any jurisdiction with which I'm reasonably familiar, and that includes the US, UK and much of the Commonwealth and the Western EU.
VG could harass you, but I'm sure a mere theist couldn't manage that.
You shouldn't really be boxing so far above your weight, now, should you?
__
Focus
("Matt. 7:3-5" Class)