Pom,
Damn, I guess you told me! I am very well aware of what the term "kinds" means. I was not referring to that. I was referring to your interpretation.
You just don't get it, do you? Here is the bottom line:
1. According to the Bible, God did not use any supernatural means in building the Ark. Therefore, it is not logical to assume He used any supernatural means to preserve Noah and the animals while on the Ark.
2. The logistics of 8 people tending to thousands of animals is beyond reason.
3. The logistics of putting thousands of animals, along with food and water on the Ark is beyond reason.
4. We could not do today, even with our technology, what Noah supposedly did 5,000 years ago.
5. Therefore, the whole account does not stand to logical reason.
6. Therefore, the whole "Noah's Ark thing" is fable; myth; a crock of shit.
7. Therefore, the Bible as a whole cannot be trusted.
8. Therefore, the God of the Bible cannot be trusted.
Any questions? (I hope not. This discussion with you is fruitless.)
Now, I guess I need to get some sleep. I am having a hard time understanding non-reasoning religionists.
Thank you very much. Have a nice day.