John Doe I'm sorry I cannot figure out the quote and respond function so far. I wanted to respond to your comment about unethical behavior and providing hope against an action happening that is unrealistic. You can end this discussion by responding to me with legal research and good case law indicating that a suit filed against wtbts in each of the states would be rejected. If you cannot prove accross the board that this suit or any suit with relating issues would not be heard, then you have no argument. Once in a Judge's hands, no one can say where it would go.
Secondly, with all due respect to those of you who have posted examples of cases that have not gone through, what I cannot say loudly enough for all to hear is :
Just because one specific reuquest was put through in one state, does not mean the topic is closed or **that this example qualifies as precedence**
A) many side issues off the same topic may be filed successfully
B) diiferent courts have different leanings per the state they represent, you will get different rulings in Texas state courts both civillay and criminally than in New Jersy state courts which are typically more liberal.
Finally, I do not control anyone's response to what they read here. You can read it and take hope, or you can read it and be irritated. My main goal is that you read it and understand that factually and realistically speaking, the US legal system does not operate the way the wtbts does. Anyone can pursue an issue they see as relevant and if they have a good attorney who understand the law, the paperwork, and can argue well, they have as good a chance as anyone at success. I think I speak for many here when I say simply opening the topic for the court system and the public to examine is itself a 'win'.