i was known as bane on here....i have gone through alot.
this is my story as best as i can recollect.
it has taken alot of courage to write this and post this...be gentle.... http://monstercafesaltillo.blogspot.mx/2013/03/my-jehovahs-witness-story-part-1.html.
The only bane i remember here posted comments such as this one found on this thread " in conclusion"
See? HAHA! One of your OWN has left because you apostates are scum! I love it! Then you berate him for when he leaves...
Mockings etc. is what goes on here. You just keep on proving what your yourselves are....
so what will happen to a witness if he doesn't shun a disfellowshipped person?
can he be disfellowshipped himself?
reproved?
If anything the recent direction from the wtbs is even more inflexible. You will find yourself in an JC if you associate with those who are DF or DA'd. This is what they didfellowshipped Ray Franz for btw
hi all - sure sure, you can call me a troll or brainwashed cult member.
i am totally interested in how your answers to these questions.. .
do you find yourself ignoring anything that jehovah's witnesses bring out in regards to their former status as an ngo?.
How about responding to this changename ? It seems that everytime someone backs you in a corner you just come up with another topic to deflect the question a good example of this is the following....
"Hi again recovering - I could be misinformed. Then, so can you. They claim that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 BCE. They claim Bible chronology is more accurate and reliable than the secular evidences. That is their defense. They trust the Bible.
Thank you for your answer, however i challange you to quote the book chapter and verse where the bible says 607bc is the date of Jerusalem's destruction. If you can I will apolagize and attend the closest kingdom hall."
Please answer this changename before you go off on another tangent.
i have seen questions regarding how much jehovah's witnesses lie all the time on yahoo answers.
here is the latest question:.
jehovah's witnesses, is lying at any time something jehovah approves of?.
Hi again recovering - I could be misinformed. Then, so can you. They claim that Jerusalem was destroyed in 607 BCE. They claim Bible chronology is more accurate and reliable than the secular evidences. That is their defense. They trust the Bible.
Thank you for your answer, however i challange you to quote the book chapter and verse where the bible says 607bc is the date of Jerusalem's destruction. If you can I will apolagize and attend the closest kingdom hall.
dear friends:.
forty-five years ago i was out in service with an elder, and we came upon a house where the owners kindly received us.
this was not so unusual as the family was jehovah's witnesses.
Never give up hope my friend be strong. Live each day to the fullest. I have had my own personal battle with cancer.
i have seen questions regarding how much jehovah's witnesses lie all the time on yahoo answers.
here is the latest question:.
jehovah's witnesses, is lying at any time something jehovah approves of?.
Ok perhaps yu are just misinformed change name. Please check this out for yourself as to the truthfulness of the wbts. They claim that jeruselem was destroyed in 607bc. There is no archelogical or historical evidence to support that claim. Why do they make that claim? Where do they come up with that date. This date is what they base all of their beliefs on regarding bible and wt chronology. Please tell me why they would persist in promoting this date.
Here is just one resourse to help you
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siege_of_Jerusalem_%28587_BC%29
what do you believe happens when one of jehovah's witnesses dies?
do they go to hell?.
if you do not respond, does it mean that you are only looking to discredit and bash the jw's?.
I am glad you at least admited you where wrong when you initialy accused me of avoiding answering your question change name. I have a concern however , you demanded that former witnesses answer your questions right away. When I posed questions for you your retort was the following...
I will answer your questions at my leisure.
This is an arrogant double standard.
I have never claimed to be an atheist by the way, Just because i do not believe in hell does not make me an atheist. In fact one of the tenants of witnesses is their rejection of the hellfire doctrine. Does that make them atheists?
what do you believe happens when one of jehovah's witnesses dies?
do they go to hell?.
if you do not respond, does it mean that you are only looking to discredit and bash the jw's?.
Here is the question you posed "What do you believe happens when one of Jehovah's Witnesses dies? Do they go to hell?"
I answered no,since i do not believe in hell. What more do you want me to say change name. How about you answer the questions i posed to you? I will tell you why you are afraid to even try to address them.
joshua tree by U2
what do you believe happens when one of jehovah's witnesses dies?
do they go to hell?.
if you do not respond, does it mean that you are only looking to discredit and bash the jw's?.
The Jehovahs witness organazation is a cult. They lie, promote false predictions, and are nothing more than a publishing corporation. I do not believe in hell so my answer to yourquestion is no. I want know how you respond to this question change name; How do you respond to the gb making predictions that never come true ie 1975, 1914 etc. How do you explain their joining the UN as an NGO ( especially after all the talk about it being a "disgusting harlot") Did not the biable not say "beware of false prophets" I challange you to respond to these questions change name. I guarentee you can not.
