Wiz,
Stay within the context of this arguement.
The only argument that I will acknowledge is the one that I have established in an unbroken thread from the beginning to the end of my posts on this topic, and which you have still not attended to.
Let me put it in very simple terms and I will use a scripture to help, this is taken from Luke 9:51-55
'51 As the days were now coming to the full for him to be taken up, he firmly set his face to go to Jerusalem. 52 So he sent forth messengers in advance of him. And they went their way and entered into a village of Sa·mar'i·tans, to make preparation for him; 53 but they did not receive him, because his face was set for going to Jerusalem. 54 When the disciples James and John saw this they said: "Lord, do you want us to tell fire to come down from heaven and annihilate them?" 55 But he turned and rebuked them.'Please note the reaction of Christ to the attitude of those who seemed to enjoy the prospect of the coming judgement on others. Can you not see that even those who have 'set their face' to Christ were not to be judged by others, or viewed as 'Armaggedon', or indeed 'Flood' fodder.
This is not about Gods attitude, but about the mans attitude, if he is fed a perpetual diet of exclusivity. This will inevitably lead to the kind of arrogance that was contained in the statement of yours quoted at the top of this page.
Can you see the point now?
Best regards -- HS