cameo-d,
First, I say.
You are a sly guy.
I did reply to your question.
No.
You have not replied to my question at all.
The meaning which I have said is not a "reply" but "answer".
I said.
I have not killed the animal until now.
However, I eat beef, pork, and chicken.
Don't you eat? Moreover, have not you eaten them once until now?
The meaning of my question is "Do you eat meat?"
What is necessary is just to answer "I eat it", if you eat it.
You said.
You are missing my point. I am not talking about killing animals for food. That is a very different subject.
It is very absurd "lame excuse".
"very different subject"?
What Nonsense!
You have to kill an animal, in order for you to eat meat.
And you said.
The book of Enoch says it was the evil angels, the Nephilim, who first began to hurt the animals. I am asking the question, do you think its possible that this "god" is actually an evil spirit and not our Creator? Look at his actions.
This explanation is also absurd.
Do you make a fool of the people of "ex- Jehovah's Witnesses"?
The book "Insight on the Scriptures" is described like this.
*** it-1 p. 729 Enoch ***
Enoch is not the writer of the “Book of Enoch.” This is an uninspired, apocryphal book written many centuries later, probably sometime during the second and first centuries B.C.E.
Why does this book become evidence?
And you said.
Have you never wondered if this god could have been one of the evil angels?
What do you think?
Do you make fun of me?
You said like this, before asking my present belief.
"god presence within" is new age metaphysical crap. You are trading one lie for another if you believe that concept.
