to cognizant:
Questions posed to make one think and reflect for oneself and not rely on other religious leaders to do it for you.
Thinking and deep contemplation is a good thing. If those questions can cause people to realize that they have the right to think for themselves...then it's a very good thing. I think JWs have been so oppressed that their thinking abilities have atrophied. The hard cores are so dependent they have to ask the elders if ice cream is OK. You know what I mean.
A lot of people involved in "christian" religions have begun to bail too, because they are seeing the lies there, as well.
These questions would be well and good if it were not for the fact that it leads into a blasphemous philosophy that "we are god." Just because I plant a seed and water it, does that mean I can make a flower?
In other religions, Christianity, Islam and Judaism especially, one must constantly deny self and become something else, perfect, holy, sacrificing, the list is endless depending on which denomination you belong to. This type of striving to become other than what we are, leads to unhappiness and depression for many people. For of course, they are always failing, never measuring up, never good enough. Punishment and eternal damnation is always a mere "grape" of God's wrath away!
You are 100% absolutely right and accurate. I agree wholeheartedly. These religions are based on guilt...how else would the rabbi make money? Why do you think Jesus turned the bird cages over and broke the tables of the money changers at the temple? He tried to expose the fraud of it all.
From all I have seen the Watchtower is the very worst of the religions. They control through fear and guilt. The penance for unworthiness is stiff. Watchtower consumes your whole life with meetings 5 days a week, making you beg on street corners and at doors to get money or converts to bring in more money, they get your children by default and maybe a few other relatives, and they can take your life, your loves, and your sanity in a moments notice.
You speak of "one religion" in a disparaging way. Yet, isn't that really the aim of Christianity? Isn't their goal to unite all mankind
NO. It is not the aim of christianity to unite mankind. It may give that impression with some words on the surface, but ALL religions are elitists. Each one thinks that "god" is exclusive to them. Christianity has done more to divide people than it ever has to unite them. It has done more to provoke war than to unite. Every sect has something that makes them exclusive to god and different from the rest. The Jews will quickly remind you that they are "God's Chosen". In other words, they are First and Best and you probably don't stand a chance! Then the christians will say "oh, no you're not. Not anymore. You forfeited your inheritence!" And then the JWs will come along and say "We are god's mouthpiece. We are the only truth." Do you have any idea how many religions say that they are the only ones with the truth? Jws are not the only ones who say that.
You speak of "one religion" in a disparaging way
Yes. Because this is the crux of the great deception that is soon to be played out. I see it as a pit fall. It is an idealistic pursuit. It will not be what it seems. "One religion" would mean that all would have to (again) participate in a beehive mentality. As long as it is a religion there will be dictates. Where there are dictates there can be no freedom of thought. It is another trap. The "eastern" religions are a new twist on views, especially considering amerika has been labeled "a christian nation" and it is the majority.
People are sick of the lies of their christian religions. Much of it has surfaced now. Christianity has faced up to the pagan holidays and some have even preached it from the pulpit now. People are ready for a change. They will readily accept the new wave of individual enlightenment as opposed to the subservience to orthodoxy. The pursuit of mystical oneness was at the heart of early Christianity. It was consumed by the business of religion as it became incorporated and mixed with Judaism and other Babylonian superstitions.
Buddhist philosophy recognizes "the one-ness" and "inter-connectedness" of all sentient beings in the present moment.
There are a lot of people I am in no way connected to nor would I want to be.
It does not wait for a vengeful God to intervene in and force "oneness" upon us.
The problem, as I see it, is the very concept of this god. If you understand who and what this god is, then you would have your answers.
The old testament is a compilation of various gods. Somewhere along the way through mis-translations, ommissions, and assumptions, all these deities got rolled into one. This became the "Yhwh/Jehovah" that people refer to today. This deity is a malevolent spirit. It is very clear this force is destructive and NOT creative as he refers to himself as a god of armies, among other undesirable characteristics.
2 Corinthians 4:4 (Wycliff) in which [the] god of this world, that is, the devil, hath blinded the souls of unfaithful men, that the lightening of the gospel of the glory of Christ, which is the image of God, shine not
Most of the world does not knowingly worship Satan, they are deceived. They have chosen religion over truth. You have seen that for yourself in the Watchtower.
committing of atrocities against their fellow man in the name of their respective God.
That will soon stop. The UN has some ideas to put those plans into operation. They have some very strong dictates coming about. As the scripture says "who can make war with the Beast?" None. Because these new policies are solid. No religion will be allowed to claim exclusivity to god. Also, JWs and Mormons will no longer be allowed to go door to door prostelytizing. These are things that no one will argue with. They are good things. People are sick of having these things forced on them on street corners and at their doors. No one will argue or make war with the beast. They will be glad to see these new laws come about.
The problem is god. There are some major problems with this deity. I do not think god is our creator.
Our creators were plural. "let US make man in OUR image". It was at least a joint effort if not a team effort. I suspect it was likely a team of scientists from another civilization.
If our creators were plural, then why do we give credit to a single deity who shows more proclivity for a destructive nature than a creative one?
Thank you for the opportunity to discuss this.