It is apparent that this thread is a continued attempt to justify your skewed reasoning in what is a degrading manner of pretensious giving.
When is a "gift" not a Gift?
*When a recipient is compelled to perform an action in order to receive such "gift" it becomes, not a gift, but compensation-in-fact for said performance.
*When by his own words, recipient states he is not allowed in store and is thus peacefully complying and "giver" demands the recipient break his peaceful stance in defiance of the store rules in order to receive a future benefit the "giver" intends to bestow.
*When "giver" demands that the recipient lower his self esteem and dignity in order to comply with demands of terms and condition of said "gift", which is, in fact, a reward for bad behavior;
When furthermore, said "gift" is not free but will be presented upon the action of recipient's fait accompli which is intended to glamorize the "giver's" appearance as benevolent, but is in fact, false and sanctimonous.
There is a right way and a wrong way to give Shelby. When one acts based on their own sense of importance with the intent to aggrandize themselves in the eyes of others, and when one accomplishes this by placing demands on the recipient to comply and be obedient to their commands in order to receive a benefit, this is NOT freely giving. This is CONDITIONAL "giving".
Would the recipient have received food had he not complied with the "giver's" terms? This we do not know. But what we can most correctly surmise, is that the "giver's" motive for the offer was ego based. This was further demonstrated by the attempt at personal edification in the eyes of others. The motivation is clearly evidenced by the disruption caused and the further demands placed on business staff by the "giver". "Giver" displayed intimidation tactics by extending implied threats of discrimination, and thus possible lawsuits, if staff co-operation was not forthcoming. This is evidenced by the circus scene and loud display to assure witnesses to "giver's" perceived discrimination. "Giver" acted with threat, duress, and coersion with intent to incite a mob action or possible lawsuit should the "giver's" terms not be met.
Any business has the right to refuse service.
Any business has a legal right to enforce its standards of dress code when properly Noticed at the entrances.
Any business has the right and the duty to protect the health, peace and well being of it's patrons.