Hyghlandyr

Joined

• started 44 topics
• posted 596 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Topics Started by Hyghlandyr

• 
  31

  Jan Haugland is APOSTATE

  by Cygnus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  so are kent steinhaug and norm hovland

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  5

  Clarifying my position

  by Cygnus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  abaddon,.

  you wrote:.

  : would you describe the jw's as;.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  13

  Prince is definitely a JW

  by Cygnus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  this is the absolute best confirmation that i have seen so far, proving that prince is a jw for sure.

  i found this on the viewaskew website (news site for kevin smith, writer and director of clerks, dogma, and jay and silent bob strike back).. "fielding numerous 'are you high on the set' queries with patience and charm, he used the questions as a jumping off point for many personal anecdotes.

  one of the highlights being a forty-minute tale on being invited to prince's paisley park to talk about filming something for prince, and ending up staying there a week filming a documentary about 'the truth' about jehovah, that 'will never see the light of day.'".

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  3

  Mary - not a virgin

  by Norm in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  as we have known for some time the bible didnt describe mary as a virgin but simply as a young woman.

  that is what the word which for so long was translated virgin means in the original text.

  read about it in the independent:.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  5

  Persecution Fever

  by radar in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  do any of you recall the persecution paranoia, that swept across the congregations in the late 80s?.

  the great tribulation was believd imminent, and bro's were getting excited and encouraging everyone to be ready.. the book study was highlighted as a meeting that must be never missed!

  because if a sudden ban came upon the kingdom hall meetings, then only those who knew where the current book study was held, would get spiritual food and help.. the next thing was "hide your watchtower literature" in places where the authorities would not find it.. jws, including myself, consequently hid literature in the walls of our homes.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  13

  Who wrote this stuff?

  by Cygnus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i don't feel like i am a mindless robot and i resent the implication.. most jws try their sincere best when it comes to practising godly devotion, but isn't the 1000 yr. reign supposed to unroot all our bad tendencies?.

  here in new york and across the usa racial tensions between 'blacks and whites' are very strong.

  for some of that to spill into our brotherhood is natural.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  13

  Cath. Encyclopedia agrees with WT re 607

  by Cygnus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  under the heading "babylonia".

  at first nabuchodonosor ii began a small guerilla warfare against jerusalem; then, in 607 b.c., he dispatched a considerable army, and after a while began the siege in person.. can any apostate tell me what's wrong with this quote?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  3

  Isn't it ironic?

  by Cygnus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i feel this way about it.

  world trade means world peace.

  and consequently the world trade center buildings in.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  18

  Last Thursdayism

  by Cygnus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  this is a chat i had a few months ago on yahoo (you people who chat on this stupid board, get yer asses over to yahoo, now!)..

  jag1lisa: what religion are you.

  cygnustsp: last thursdayist.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  14

  You Know, what a clown

  by Cygnus in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i see you know is back.

  i haven't been keeping up with the boards in some time, but i see that robert is still here, trying to support his rather unique blend of larouche/rutherfordian end-time predictions.. well, i happened across the thread between yk and amazing, and i noticed that yk once again had his facts in error.

  he said that larouche got 25% of the democratic primary vote in arkansas in 2000. i assume he meant 2000, because larouche wasn't close to 25% in 1996. well, the fact is that larouche only got 21.53% of the primary vote in arkansas in 2000. is that such a big number so as to make larouche a real, viable candidate?

  1. 
  2. 
  3.