D.O.T.,
In post 23 of 29 you state:
"As pointed out earlier in the thread, gifts of prophesying and infallible direction have ceased (can people please read a topic before replying to it?), all that anyone can do today is try to interpret prophecies in the Bible, not make them. We do not compare the Watchtower to the Bible, Gods Word comes before anything else in terms of importance".
What about this?
The December 15, 2008 Watchtower on page 28 states:
“Our coming to know “the truth” – the entire body of Christian teachings that has become part of the Bible – and adhering to it are essential for salvation.”
Before you jump to the Watchtower's defense and claim that's not what they meant, consider the following.
“The truth” when stated by a JW refers to all the teachings and doctrines of the Watchtower Society. Of course, the Watchtower Society instructions to Jehovah’s Witnesses include the notion that their teachings encompass “the entire body of Christian teachings”.
In the OP the "WT 1986 4/1 Questions from Readers" is quoted:
▪ Why have Jehovah’s Witnesses disfellowshipped (excommunicated) for apostasy some who still profess belief in God, the Bible, and Jesus Christ?
"Obviously, a basis for approved fellowship with Jehovah’s Witnesses cannot rest merely on a belief in God, in the Bible, in Jesus Christ, and so forth. The Roman Catholic pope, as well as the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, professes such beliefs, yet their church memberships are exclusive of each other. Likewise, simply professing to have such beliefs would not authorize one to be known as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses.
Approved association with Jehovah’s Witnesses requires accepting the entire range of the true teachings of the Bible, including those Scriptural beliefs that are unique to Jehovah’s Witnesses." WT 1986 4/1 Questions from Readers.
How can you claim that the so called FDS don't place their unique teachings from the Watchtower publications, on par with the bible? Or that they don't infer it at the very least? Yet the FDS as "God's only channel of communication" claim to be uninspired..... Hmmm. Which brings up another question. How can "God's only channel of communication" be uninspired? How can you trust what they publish in that case? Communication implies a dialogue, between at least 2 parties right? How do they communicate with Jehovah? Why do they keep getting it wrong, are they not listening?