Following the Bible as a whole and following Christ are two different things. The first part of the Bible was the law and history of the Jews, so I've never figured out why Christians feel so obliged to adopt it or honor it? I don't see a lot of rabbis on TV explaining the New Testament for Jews, but somehow, Christians just feel this need to interpret the OT for Christian application. Does that make any sense?
See, to me, this is a huge area where the JWs screw things up. They're so into getting Yahweh, that ancient Jewish way of looking at God (which probably was more or less appropriate for people of that time and place), into modern Christianity that they forget things like Oh...Christ said he fulfilled that, for instance?
They're always trying to shoehorn the WTS into the OT prophecies about the Jews. I used to sit there at those book studies about Daniel and Isaiah and listen to these ridiculous conclusions with absolutely no logical progression of "Well, obviously, Isaiah was foretelling the modern day organization" and my brain was just exploding from the STUPID.
No, Isaiah wasn't foretelling anything about the WTS, at least, not that I could see. It was just because they SAID SO, and that's why that's the first meeting I quit going to.
Christ is pretty simple, really, and actually nothing that many other religious innovators have come up with, which shows that they're good and workable ideas because so many people see the usefulness of them.
The necessity fundamentalists and literalists seem to have of making every sentence or word of the Bible fit into their lives and intepretations of reality astound me. I don't get it, never will. How does that make you more RIGHT than other religions?
It's not more RIGHT to be more literal in interpretation of ANYTHING. I don't understand how those two things overlap and serve to convince people of their RIGHTNESS. They don't even have the same definition!