Hi Kenpo,
Well, when I left and what I am now are very different. Unlike many I didn't leave because I found out about some error in chronology or certain doctrinal matters, it was more on a personal level, a gut feeling if you will. However, having said that I should note that I am not interested in something because I happen to like it. And as you said, it's not about titles or labels and I feel the same way. It seems to me a person who needs to have a religious label to size up how spiritual or how kind and friendly someone is just has no sense.
To me it isn't even relevant whether you're religious or not. If some stranger does a kind deed toward you, are you going to go out of your way to find out whether they are religious in any way, what exactly they believe and so on? Does any of that change the fact that they were being kind just for it's own sake? Yet we have to get into these "intellectual" debates as if all that matters so much. I wouldn't say an individuals behavior represents the religion which he or she may subscribe to, but that's something that is actually real. On the other hand, all the concepts you read about, religious or not, is only theory. Now I think that's important too, but most people don't understand it or don't want to talk about it, so that's fine. Ideally the two would complement each other, but realistically I think we tend to be on first base or need to get there first. I guess it's like SaintSatan's quote: He that doesn't live his faith doesn't have any. And again it realy isn't even about faith, but for all the scholarly research and all the intelligence a given person may have, what good is it if they don't even have a clue about being a decent human being to start with? Maybe most of the world just needs to get their heads out of their asses and start worrying about that rather than taking sides. I'm this, I'm that, nah nah nah.. How special.