sd-7

Joined

• started 290 topics
• posted 3,788 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by sd-7

• 
  30

  Article: If God saved an American doctor with Ebola, why did he let 1,200 Africans die?

  by AndersonsInfo in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2014/aug/25/ebola-africans-die-god-american-doctorif god saved an american doctor with ebola, why did he let 1,200 africans die?it must be lovely for people such as dr kent brantly to be so sure of god's existence.

  for the rest of us, it's not so easy.

  ebola survivor dr kent brantly.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  The idea of God saving someone from a virus is kind of a paradox. You see, God would have had to create the virus, and would also have created humans with vulnerability to such viruses. Unless perhaps God left that part out of the punishment he handed to Adam. You'll eat bread, the ground will be cursed, [and oh, by the way, you'll be getting colds, the flu, chicken pox, measles, Ebola, and so on...]until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken.

  It's ironic that apes have better immune systems than we do, yet we were supposedly the pinnacle of creation, right? Ha.

  But yes, the idea that God saved him and let a bunch of other people die is pretty absurd and serves to minimize the scope of tragedy that has come from this terrible disease. It's sad, that's all.

  --sd-7
• 
  43

  Do the Governing Body believe their own teachings or know it's a lie? Are they atheists?

  by BucketShopBill in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  the new young blood gb member, you think he really thinks this is the truth or is he protecting his financial interest like all the older gb members who enjoy basking in glory of men?

  do you think they believe in the "over-lapping generation" or was that a mistake done by barr?.

  how much of the watchtower and the bible do the governing body know, ray franz jr. said he was not impressed with their bible knowledge and their lack of knowledge of the watchtower cannon.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  It is possible they believe it, but abundantly clear they do not believe all of it. If they did, they would never see a need to change any teachings. The fact they do indicates that they don't believe all of it. They have their own opinions about certain issues, and if they can convince the rest of the GB, then it becomes doctrine and gets printed.

  It is also clear that certain changes are consciously made for specific practical reasons, and this too suggests that they do not entirely believe it, but are nonetheless willing to use it to maintain the illusion of the all-knowing 'organization'/all-knowing 'faithful slave'.

  --sd-7
• 
  34

  "Jehovah's Witnesses do better after surgery without transfusion" - Article (July 3, 2012)

  by Da.Furious in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  this article from 2012 published by the birmingham news showed up on my facebook page.. what i would have liked to see in the statistics is the inclusion of total jws refusing blood transfusion and their survival rate not only the ones taht surviced, taking about only survivors is not like for like comparison in my opinion with patients who take blood transfusion and then dont survive.. .

  .

  .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  What has to be remembered here is, it is not simply by virtue of being a JW and refusing blood that these patients fared well. They were obviously given some very good medical care by trained professionals, and great precautions were taken to minimize blood loss. In the absence of the kind of resources used in these scenarios, the JW who refuses blood might well not fare nearly so well.

  In other words, there's nothing magical happening here. You can't claim it's the result of obedience to Jehovah, because it's not. It's the result of good medical care that takes their personal beliefs into consideration and devises smart ways to work around them and still give the patient the best care.

  Let's also remember that a JW going to medical school would be considered as seeking glory for himself...unless he gets called upon for the privilege of serving at Bethel, I suppose...

  --sd-7
• 
  70

  JW.ORG signs to be put on all Kingdom Halls! New directive.

  by stuckinarut2 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  so i have been told that all kingdom halls are to have a large jw.org sign placed prominently out the front..... can anyone confirm this?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  When I took my wife to the meeting last night, I saw that they now have the JW.ORG sign up on the Kingdom Hall sign out in front. So...looks like it's everywhere. It definitely doesn't match the brick design, but I guess the important thing is that it be blue, with 'JW.ORG' in white letters. That is all.

  --sd-7
• 
  25

  Craziest demon/magic/supernatural stories you heard when you were a JW

  by EndofMysteries in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  share yours, i'll start if off, i have a few i heard from the platform or from other jw's.

  one from the platform, a witch was studying with jw's, and she had a relationship with demons/spirits.

  when she was studying they turned on her and threatened her if she didn't stop.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  My mom often told us that demons were speaking to her, and that was what prompted her to become a JW. She said they would tell jokes and threaten her. They supposedly told her that the JWs were the ones who knew the truth about them, so she called the KH and started a 'Bible study'.

  She also concluded that the demons were talking to my great aunt in the days before my great aunt died, and that they were supposedly threatening her and telling her she was going to die. So...I've had some interesting times growing up, you could say.

  --sd-7
• 
  18

  July WT Study magazine - How can any intelligent person believe these things??

  by Faithful Witness in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i haven't been paying attention, i admit... but thought i would go and look at their latest magazine, and see what my parents are spending their precious energy on this month.

  my mom retired in may, and we have seen her just once since then.

  our invitations have been rejected, due to meetings, conventions, service work requirements, etc.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  "Thus, being hated for bearing Jehovah's name is the same as 'being reproached for the name of [Jesus] Christ,' who said to his opposers: 'I have come in the name of my Father, but you do not receive me.' (John 5:43)"

  This, from the people who removed any mention of Jesus Christ from the cover of their flagship magazine, The Watchtower. What was wrong with being a "Herald of Christ's Presence"?

  I couldn't tell you how many people I encountered over the years who didn't think JWs even believed in Jesus. More people probably know they don't celebrate birthdays than could actually explain their 'good news' message. So...being hated for bearing Jehovah's name is not the same, not the same at all.

  --sd-7
• 
  83

  Blown away-- where to go from here

  by All for show in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i stumbled upon this website a few weeks ago due to the jw.org ridiculousness, since then i haven't been able to pull myself away.

  the thoughts, feelings, and concerns i have had the past few years aren't just mine.

  it's global.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  Welcome. Another awakening. It sounds like you have already started down the right path. I wonder what advice I could possibly offer here.

  Well, since you're married, I would say, until you are absolutely sure of how your mate feels, you'd best keep your doubts to yourself. My wife turned me in to the elders for having doubts, and it was a very difficult time. I told the story on here a few years ago, along with what I could write down from my committee. Check out my 'Borg Court' threads for that. For now, be careful about who you trust. That's the first bit of advice.

  The second bit of advice is to continue reading as many different books as possible to broaden your perspective on all this. That'll be a real lifeline in helping you in the transition process. It has definitely kept me sane and brought me a lot more peace than I otherwise would have had.

  The other thing is, this is going to be very stressful, especially if you have to maintain appearances for a time. So you need to take good care of yourself. And...find someone who understands how you feel and talk to them. There are good people here who I'm sure will be of great help to you.

  It won't be easy, but you can make it. I hope you and your family will be able to find your way to lasting freedom in due time.

  --sd-7
• 
  16

  JW.ORG signs on Assembly Hall

  by Nosferatu in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  what the hell is going on here?

  i drove past the assembly hall today and noticed the square blue jw.org signs on the building.

  coupled with the steel gate that keeps worldlings out, it really looks quite cultish.. so is that the new name for the kingdom halls or something?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  Yeah, I'll reiterate what I said on the thread Nosferatu mentioned--the Assembly Hall in my area also has the JW.ORG logo on it--that blue square logo. I was just out there yesterday to take my family to the assembly. So it's happening.

  --sd-7
• 
  70

  JW.ORG signs to be put on all Kingdom Halls! New directive.

  by stuckinarut2 in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  so i have been told that all kingdom halls are to have a large jw.org sign placed prominently out the front..... can anyone confirm this?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  I just saw the old assembly hall last weekend and it definitely does have the JW.ORG logo on the sign. I don't suppose that's an indication of anything, is it?

  --sd-7
• 
  71

  BORG running low on $$$??

  by fader77 in

  1. watchtower
  2. scandals

  dear brothers:.

  re: personal literature supply.

  reducing existing stock at the branch office before the revisions are released.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  sd-7

  If they are admitting that the current books are out of date and new versions with updated "truth" (in other words, it wasn't "truth" to begin with) are about to be released, they are clearly admitting that they offer false or defective information to their readers.

  As overt an admission as you'll ever get from them that they don't care about teaching people the truth at all. Or maybe they can rationalize it by saying, well, *most* of it is still 'the truth', so why delay giving it out on account of a little information that has already been adjusted? If the person is really interested, they'll find out the adjusted teaching anyway. No sense in wasting a good book, right?

  --sd-7