They were, for all intents & purposes, like slaves. Their life expentancy was only about 30-40 years, mainly due to the harsh conditions of working in the fields. On the other hand, the average life of a Roman was considerably longer, about 65-70 years.
This is just nonsense. Those who made this TV programme must have been very ignorant of history. The average life expectancy was nowhere in the world as high as 40 in the ancient world. Most likely it was around 21-22 in both places, which is the same as it was in the Stone Age, and what it still was everywhere in the world until around 1600, when there began a gradual increase in Europe due to better food supply.
Source: Ascardi, George and J. Nemeskeri. 1970. History of Human Life Span and Mortality. Budapest: Akademiai Kiado.
Roman control of Palestine was reasonable lax. Romans rarely interfered in local politics, but wanted to keep law and order. In this time and age, most everyone were slaves under those who owned the land.
Like always in history, it wasn't the poor who opposed the foreign rule, it was thise who had something to lose: the (small but important) middle class.
- Jan
--
"Common sense is the collection of prejudices acquired by age eighteen"
-- Albert Einstein