in the crowded corridors at the district convention, there was a purse snatcher.
i was in the right place at the right time to catch it all.. this guy grabbed this sister's purse and made off with it.
she screamed and several brothers were in purseuit.
Great story, I really enjoyed it.
I always figured the Witnesses didn't pass the hat because you couldn't get it passed the contribution boxes, as this purse snatcher found out! It's a shame Witnesses can't drop something at an assembly without it landing in a contribution box.
i recently ordered another copy of "in search of christian freedom" as i got rid of my first one (long story) and since it had been a couple of years since i read it, i decided to get another one.. since i live in a fairly small town, i decided to give a fake name, in case someone worked at the book store that might be a jw.
it was saturday morning (a time when all good little jw's should be in field service) so i felt it safe to go pick up my book.
i walk into the store and headed for the counter but was stopped in my tracks by an elder and his family.
Life as a Jehovah's Witness is like living during the times of the Salem Witch Trials of 1692. It's difficult believing in 2001 that adults need to hide books from slaves of a publishing firm that sells books! Indeed, Jehovah's Witnesses live in a strange world.
the wise man j. f. rutherford wrote about the "cause of the flood" in his 1927 book creation (pp.
here he informed us of "jehovah's" view of the scientific "annular flood theory" of one isaac newton vail, which the watchtower society had been promoting for decades:.
annular means that which has the form of a ring, or ring-shaped.
Hi Alan,
Alan Rogerson is on target, with one exception. The Watchtower Society has developed money making into a hard science.
god can you believe, it speaker talking about the end being so near we just have to keep going out in the territory (bother people who don't want to talk with us) and keep the magazines moving because the end is near.
she said you could here uh huh from some of the braindead.
the truly brain dead there just eat it up, can't believe people can still believe that after all the failures.
Joel,
What's up; are you doing okay now?
as you may know, victims from the nazi camps can get compensation, and the watchtower has naturally found a new way to get money - from the dead!
they propose that they will get the money - and "give it away to needy jws".
since when did the watchtower do anything of the kind?
Kent,
Special consideration should be given to applications of the surviving Jehovah's Witness victims of Nazi persecution. The Watch Tower would use a portion of the Settlement Fund to support its ongoing research and archival work on the Holocaust and presentations of its findings.
There is no limit to the lies the Watchtower will tell in defrauding others out of money! Perhaps the Tower will sue hospitals next for the countless dead JWs that were not allowed to accept blood transfusions. I'm sure more JWs died and continue dying from the Watchtower Holocaust than the Nazi Holocaust. Surely the Watchtower can make money on this by researching how much blood loss is required in order to die. They have a great control group for this study.
I'm certain the $$$Tower will use the loot for "research" if one considers research exploring additional ways of bilking money from future suckers. Asking how low will the Watchtower go, one needs to dig a hole to China in order to answer.
god can you believe, it speaker talking about the end being so near we just have to keep going out in the territory (bother people who don't want to talk with us) and keep the magazines moving because the end is near.
she said you could here uh huh from some of the braindead.
the truly brain dead there just eat it up, can't believe people can still believe that after all the failures.
Red,
I guess it would be necessary to pull a "Clinton" on this one and ask for the definition of "near".
lol--good one! At least Clinton didn't try screwing our global environment; we can't say that about Bush. Of course the Tower has already defined what near is: "1874, 1914, 1918, 1919, Millions Now Living Will Never Die (1920), 1925, 1975, before end of 20th century".
in the book faith on the march by alexander h. macmillan, page 43 it states:.
"in october, 1902, i attended a convention in washington, d.c., where i was married.
my wife and i then spent a year in california, returning in 1904 to allegheny.".
Hi Maximus,
Jan is quite right in citing Jim Penton's excellent summarizing what the charismatic Mac did as "Macchiavellian." He was the enforcer. Don't measure internal feelings by external actions. Happens all the time. The end justifies the means. (If you have not read Penton, you should.)
It's been a few years since reading Penton's work, so the information is a little foggy. I'll need to review it again to bring some points back into focus. From what I remember, Russell didn't want the mantle of leadership passed to Rutherford, and many (if not most) Bible Students were loyal to Russell. I assume MacMillan felt the same way, yet he was a great force in maneuvering the mantle of leadership against the wishes of the Elijah-like Russell. I wonder why MacMillan helped sabotage the Elijah-like mantel of leadership that rested with Russell by redirecting its intended shoulders (which was not Rutherford)? If MacMillan really believed God was backing this Elijah-like mantel through Russell, why did he sabotaged the process Russell had in place after he died. Wouldn't MacMillan think he was going against the arrangement God had in place?
Guess I better take another look at Penton's work.
in the book faith on the march by alexander h. macmillan, page 43 it states:.
"in october, 1902, i attended a convention in washington, d.c., where i was married.
my wife and i then spent a year in california, returning in 1904 to allegheny.".
wasasister,
I'm very interested in having a copy of the book. Please e-mail me at [email protected] Thanks for offering it!
in the book faith on the march by alexander h. macmillan, page 43 it states:.
"in october, 1902, i attended a convention in washington, d.c., where i was married.
my wife and i then spent a year in california, returning in 1904 to allegheny.".
Jan--Maximus made an interesting comment:
Mac was very outgoing, forceful in personality and in private made no bones about his distaste for the Judge, in comparison to the "saintly" Pastor.
If MacMillian didn't really care for Rutherford, I wonder why he promoted the scoundrel? Did his dislike for Rutherford surface after the monster was already created?
in the book faith on the march by alexander h. macmillan, page 43 it states:.
"in october, 1902, i attended a convention in washington, d.c., where i was married.
my wife and i then spent a year in california, returning in 1904 to allegheny.".
ros,
I could just about believe anything that involved Schnell. On the other hand, humors in the Tower can be bazaar, even from reliable sources. However, we're talking about Schnell here . . .
