Rick is mistaken to think that the only way to oppose the organisation is by going public and manning a banner. He is wrong to question the integrity of other posters who choose to remain annonymous but who still post articles and raise awareness of the damage of the organisation by other means.
I speak from my own experience that the posts of these people were instrumental in making me question my beliefs and make the decision to leave the organisation behind. I don't need to know who Outlaw, Cedars and others are outside of this forum to value their opinions and ideas. Sometimes we become so wedded to the way that we approach a problem that we cannot see that there are other methods that are equally valid.
The strength of the forum is the wide range of perspectives, and whilst I may not agree with everything presented by everyone I respect the right of people to post. There is no hierarchy or rule that states that those DA'd or DF'd for apostacy have greater authority than those who still remain in the organisation trying to fade. No one truly understands the issues of each individual and therefore is in no position to judge someone as less worthy than another.
Rick finds it difficult to apologise but in this case admitting that he made a mistake is an act of humanity and strength not a sign of weakness. The organisation is extremely damaging and to continue to hurt one another when we are free of their control is criminal.