Those pesky Chinese……
Anyway, I think that Genesis, and the entire Hebrew library, make more sense when you look at them as a set of myths to convey a message. I believe there may have been some kind of flood (local) that was used as a back drop for the story of Noah, but the facts are not relevant, the theme of the story is. Now we can argue about the theme of the myth of Noah for days with people drawing what ever conclusion from it that fits their own set of prejudices.
Fundamentalists amaze me; they refuse to acknowledge that the bible contains myths. This is even more astounding when you look at the example of Jesus, a man that continually used metaphor to prove his point. My point is that if Jesus was the perfect example of God (theoretically the author of the bible) and used metaphor to deliver his message, isn’t it logical that God would also use metaphor to deliver his message.
While I am rambling on, another thing I have noticed is the similarities between people that think they have all the answers, fundamentalist and rabid (not all) atheist. Fundies believe that the whole bible must be factual correct or no God; foaming at the mouth atheists feel that there is no god because the bible is not factually correct. Really these are two groups I can’t stand. Every thing must be black or white, no grey, no maybe, no middle ground; even in matters of opinion. I see very little difference between them as people.
Jelly
Reply to objections before they are aired:
I am not addressing all atheist or religionist; just one class of each. I am aware some people become atheist for reasons other than I have listed; reasons I find more valid. Likewise, I am not condemning all Christians; just the radical subset of the group. To me fundies/rabid atheist are indistinguishable.