Your case is entirely different from Thomas', dear one. In Thomas' case, Thomas believed from the start.
There you go again, presuming you know something about me and using your imagination to fill the blanks to make your point. You can't do that. I did beleive too, and then had doubts.
Be all of that as it may, it was what he said to Thomas NEXT that is of importance and takes into consideration YOUR case:
That is completely irrelevant to my point, which you are doing your best to avoid. Having faith seems to be irrelevant when god (and in this case, we are specifically talking about jesus) when god is making the decision to physically manifest himself. Again, see Balaam, Neb, Thomas, Moses, etc.
Now, you want to put yourself on the same "level" as Thomas and say, "Well, unless I HEAR [with my ears] or SEE [with my eyes]... I won't believe."
Why not? Are we not all human? Are you saying Thomas, by virtues OF NOT having faith, was more special? What about Judas Iscariot? He was an apostle. What about the random Israelites and Romans Jesus appeared before or passed on the street and chatted with? Were they more special than the billions living today? They weren't asking for anything but suddenly there was the son of god standing there in the street doing miracle. Many of them had no idea who Jesus even was or, of they did, had no faith (like Romans and the Pharisees). They had no faith and weren't asking for anything.
But I cannot apologize for or deny them... because then I might as well apologize for and deny my own existence. Which I simply cannot do. Why? One reason: it would be a LIE.
No one is asking you to.
I mean, at least dear Outlaw is HONEST.
Most children are. They still act like children and need to be treated as such, however.
With regard to my use of the Bible... you are absolutely right. And I cannot TELL you how much I truly HATE that I have to do so. I would SO much rather just share these things with you and others...
OK, so, at this point you are kind of saying you are completely uninspired by God. You said parts of the bible are uninspired, you quote them ad also tell me you have had god bear witness of the same things to you in visions. If they are uninspired and yet you are having that same uninspired witness borne to you, then that makes you uninspired as well.
HOW did I see it? By looking at the One we were told to look at: Christ. The Mirror.
What about Muslims or Tibetans or or native americans 300 years ago? They weren't told to look at christ.
But I cannot apologize for or deny them... because then I might as well apologize for and deny my own existence. Which I simply cannot do. Why? One reason: it would be a LIE.
No one is asking you to. At least, I am not.
So, don't believe me. I cannot care, truly.
Yet you still keep posting. Your actions say different than your words. Truly the Christian way.
So, yes, let's leave off this discussion. You do not "see" or "hear" what I am saying, any more than you hear Christ speak to you... and for the very same reason. You don't really want to. So be it.
Sure. Let's leave it off. At this point, you have said that everyone that seeks god can hear his spirit speaking to them. When some say they can't, you presume to know enough about them to explain why. You presume to put yourself on the same level as the prophets and apostles (that was with the whole "equating yourself with thomas" comment). You fill in the blanks about other peoples lives to explain why they aren't good enough to hear the voices when you don't know anything about that person. you call the most of the bible uninspired and then use to defend your visions of the same things without understanding that is equating your visions with what you just called uninspired works. Every case in the bible with Jesus or the voice of god or god himself appearing is a "speacial case" that you say I can't use for my argument. Well, if every case is special, then none are special! The person sitting next to Jesus when he had to take a dump along the side of the road must have been a special case too, then. You painted yourself into a corner, then painted your feet, then your entire body to avoid answering questions about which you said you knew the answers, at least, until your answer didn't make sense (unless, of course, you decide to ignore the bits you don't like, which is, in fact, a pretty christian thing to do).
Your humility in presuming to say god has revealed to you what he has revealed to no others and to tell people what is wrong with them is truly truly astoundingly awesomely the exact opposite of humility. And you are too blind to see it. So, yeah, I would totally agree that you are a perfect example of a Christian.