recently i have looked at youtube on interesting topics.
i wrote also to all 129 bethel-homes around the world and suggested them to search on youtube on illuminati, freemasons, 666, new world order, fema coffins, fema concentration camps, rfid chip, rockefeller, antichrist.. very interesting stuff!
i suggest you also to search on "the third temple" could soon to be built in jerusalem.
I wrote also to all 129 Bethel-homes around the world and suggested them to search on youtube on illuminati, freemasons, 666, New world order, FEMA coffins, FEMA concentration camps, RFID chip, Rockefeller, antichrist.
True. The best action WE can take is to to ding a ding dang our dang a long ling longs.
that christians throw the old 'where did the matter come from if there was a big bang'?, while having no problem with thinking that god was always there!.
so the dust in the room had to have a 'maker'?
but the super-computer brain sky-daddy is just there and always has been?.
Would you like to borrow a cup of humor, Notverylikely, or don't they have that on your planet?
Wow, you sure don't like it when someone points out that you made an error when you are telling other people they are probably wrong, do you?
In case you didn't know, it's not the easiest thing in the world to tell when someone is being facetious or humorous in their writing (particularly when they use words like "It's total bullshit plagiarism"), so the generally accepted custom is to use smileys or some other indicator.
The fact that you don't even GET that I'm basically agreeing with you is hilarious. at least to me. I look forward to your posts. I'm aware that I tend to phrase things melodramatically and humorously, and part of humor is exaggeration ( I just hate explaining humor, it's so unfunny!). I exaggerate to be funny, not to be inaccurate, although I am. I just don't expect anyone to take me this SERIOUSLY!
Well now that I know that I can read that inflection in. Without knowing it, how could I have been expected to since I don't know you at all?
I am pretty nice and funny guy, but if I don't KNOW someone is being humorous, I tend to not read it that way. Let's be friends now and enjoy nice big cup of lemon mint iced tea together.
this has been a wt buzzword for a long time but has come up in several recent discussions here.
so, i just had to look it up on the wt library cd-rom.. the word "evidently" appears 1,439 times in the insight books alone.
that number is staggering considering that the two-volume set is supposed to be comprised of encyclopedic facts.
Brothers, is it not happifying that reasonable Christians agree with us?
That would evidently be the apparent reasonable conclusion.
i've never been one to believe in " ghosts " .
i'm open to the possibility that there may exist something in the afterlife or spirit world- i just don't know what it is.
having been out of the witnesses over 6 years i had my fill of being a jehovah's witness and being told how " scared " i should be of satan or the demons.
Supposedly, they hang around places where they had a connection in life.
If they don't know anything and are confused, how would they know to go there? That's what the zombies did in Dawn of the Dead. Except they all went to the mall.
this was a late medieval book printed not long after the gutenberg process became available.
it is a treatise on how to discover, question by torture, and execute witches.. it is thought that several thousand were printed over the years (maybe second only to the bible in distribution in its day) - and that this was in large part responsible for the witch hunts in europe.
the final example here in the americas - the salem witch trials.. it made me think about the jw propensity (and secret love of) all things "demonic".
hmm...sounds interesting. I will need to see if I can watch that online. Currently I am in love with How the Earth Was Made....I never thought geology could be so exciting.
i've never been one to believe in " ghosts " .
i'm open to the possibility that there may exist something in the afterlife or spirit world- i just don't know what it is.
having been out of the witnesses over 6 years i had my fill of being a jehovah's witness and being told how " scared " i should be of satan or the demons.
It it were just some other newer run-of-the-mill office space I might not think so.
Why would ghosts prefer older places with history?
that christians throw the old 'where did the matter come from if there was a big bang'?, while having no problem with thinking that god was always there!.
so the dust in the room had to have a 'maker'?
but the super-computer brain sky-daddy is just there and always has been?.
I think we have to come to a point where we say to ourselves that something always existed.
Why could not that something be energy ?
It could well have been. Energy and mass are the same thing, after all. But then the question just becomes "what do you mean by 'always'"
that christians throw the old 'where did the matter come from if there was a big bang'?, while having no problem with thinking that god was always there!.
so the dust in the room had to have a 'maker'?
but the super-computer brain sky-daddy is just there and always has been?.
I bet you all still believe that Einstein first theorized relativity. He didn't. He made it popular and more understandable, but French physicist Henri Poincaré wrote hundreds of papers on it and 30 books long before Einstein.
Poincare wasn't the first either. Like most scientists, they all built off the work of each other. The theory evolved with each contributing their own ideas, some were accepted and later tossed, some were rejected and later realized to be correct, etc.
It's interesting that Einstein sat studying and discussing the work of Poincaré for years, published a book that featured a theory that was startlingly similar to Poincaré's, and then didn't reference Poincaré once in the entire book.
*sigh*....Einsteins first paper came out only three months after poincare's short paper on the subject, but before poincares long papers on it. Einstein did acknowledge poincare in other papers. Why do people love drama and theft and lies when the trust is usually much simpler?
that christians throw the old 'where did the matter come from if there was a big bang'?, while having no problem with thinking that god was always there!.
so the dust in the room had to have a 'maker'?
but the super-computer brain sky-daddy is just there and always has been?.
Believers are always trying to uderstand and "quantify" the nature of God, something far more vast and hard to understand than just the "mere"universe.
I know. All the beleivers have is a book with the newest information being almost 2000 years old and are stuck with that as what they have to understand despite it's apparent contradictions.
Scientists have tools and information that is constantly made better.
Sure there has always been an element of "It is enough to know God", or an element that advocated "don't ask", but the truth is, though vocal, they are the minority.
That may be true, but they are the ones that get heard. Perception becomes reality.
that christians throw the old 'where did the matter come from if there was a big bang'?, while having no problem with thinking that god was always there!.
so the dust in the room had to have a 'maker'?
but the super-computer brain sky-daddy is just there and always has been?.
Balance of opposites
Except that one seeks ignorance under the guise of knowledge and the other accepts where ignorance is and seeks to know more.
