why is it that the story of the resurrection of lazarus of bethany only is mentioned in the book of john and not in the other three gospel accounts of the life of jesus?.
the resurrection of lazarus was a major event in the life of jesus, but three writers failed to mention it, why?.
.
The thing is, when we look for FACTS in the bible, always a tauting task, LOL!
I completely agree. Verifiable facts are few and far between, whereas contradictions and stories that are so massive they should have left some indication or record of their having happened but without that record of any kind are a dime a dozen :)
why is it that the story of the resurrection of lazarus of bethany only is mentioned in the book of john and not in the other three gospel accounts of the life of jesus?.
the resurrection of lazarus was a major event in the life of jesus, but three writers failed to mention it, why?.
.
You're right PSac, I meant "wasn't". Regarding the event, wikipedia has this to say:
"Regarding the Massacre of the Innocents, although Herod was certainly guilty of many brutal acts, including the killing of his wife and two of his sons, no other known source from the period makes any reference to such a massacre. [ 13 ] Since Bethlehem was a small village, the number of male children under the age of 2, would probably not exceed 20. This may be the reason for the lack of other sources for this history, [ 14 ] although Herod's order in Matthew 2:16 includes those children in Bethlehem's vicinity making the massacre larger numerically and geographically.
The only other canonical gospel to give an explicit nativity narrative, the Gospel of Luke, places the birth of Jesus ten years after Herod's death, during the Census of Quirinius, and as such makes no mention of Herod or any Massacre of the Innocents."
why is it that the story of the resurrection of lazarus of bethany only is mentioned in the book of john and not in the other three gospel accounts of the life of jesus?.
the resurrection of lazarus was a major event in the life of jesus, but three writers failed to mention it, why?.
.
I think it's relevant to ask why the death of all male babies 2 and under, if it actually happened as ordered by herod, was mentioned anywhere in any secular source....
there are over 120 comments in response to my "discoveries of barbara anderson" article found on freeminds.org, but this particular one posted yesterday really got to me.
any watch tower apologists who might post a response here better choose their words carefully because anybody that tries to defend this insane "two witness" policy has to be insane too.
read on.... sad consequence.
Weird. I know someone that did the exact same things for the same reasons except he never rose higher than MS.
this would be both the intial investgatory meeting and judicial committee.
honest and straightforward, my own faults and errors included.
if so, i will take the time to write it up.
alright, I will start writing it up. will probably take a few days
this would be both the intial investgatory meeting and judicial committee.
honest and straightforward, my own faults and errors included.
if so, i will take the time to write it up.
it's already out there. identifying details will be changed to protect the guilty, of course.
this would be both the intial investgatory meeting and judicial committee.
honest and straightforward, my own faults and errors included.
if so, i will take the time to write it up.
This would be both the intial investgatory meeting and judicial committee. Honest and straightforward, my own faults and errors included. If so, I will take the time to write it up
illustrate why a husband should treat his wife.
15 in this respect, an experienced married.
brother illustrated why a husband should.
look sweetie, stop thinking, get ouf the way of the TV and pronto it back into the kitchen and make me a salami sandwich and bring me a beer. and the rug rat needs changing when you're done with that.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/livescience/20100819/sc_livescience/ageconfirmedforevemotherofallhumans.
.
of course its theory but intresting nonetheless..
1) The existence of mitochondrial Eve (ME) is a logical conclusion; as such it lend equal evidence to both creation and evolution.
How does that lend any credence to creation?
Thanks everyone. I do have a cigar and drinks at the ready for tonight!
