There is a lot of pontificating on both sides of this issue here.
Dunscott makes the following statement:
Can someone at least say approximately how many people have come forth, without revealing identities? Is it 100 or 200 or 1000 persons? Even these numbers would be small in relation to the number of Witnesses who abhor the practice of child molestation, and refuse to practice it.
This statement goes back to the, Witnesses are just imperfect people argument. An argument that I find ludicrous. If only 1000 small children's lives were ruined, this is made up for by the fact that millions of witnesses would not have molested them? How is this different from any other organization, not claiming to be God's one source of truth and ark of salvation.
On the other hand, people who come out and say Leo Greenlees was a child molester and are not willing to do so publicly are simply cowards. It is very easy to spread information about someone else when there is no recompense for the false accusation. It does seem pretty clear that he was a homosexual. A person who is forced to suppress his homosexuality for decades, I believe is prone to turning to pedophilia as an outlet because he feels somewhat safe that he can bully the child into secrecy. A secrecy that is necessary to upholding his own secret identity. Heterosexuals will never understand the mental pressure and self subjugation this requires and what toll it takes.
However, I do not excuse pedophilia under any circumstance. It is simply vile. I do however, also condemn a system where homosexuals must sublimate their sexuality. Of course, I would recommend that all homosexual witnesses leave the organization immediately for their own mental health.
Accusers of others must be prepared to come forward publicly and produce evidence. If not, anyone with a personal vendetta against another person could just come out and say that that person molested them.
I was alone with young boys and girls many times during my years as a publisher, pioneer and bethelite. Kids always liked me because I was silly and liked to tell them stories and play games with them. If one of those people today became angered because they saw that I was now an exJW or was angered that I was an "out" homosexual, they could make an accusation that I would not be able to defend myself against. Should I be reported to the police based on one person's testimony? Should my life be forever irrevocably ruined because of this? This seems to be what some are arguing for here. If not, please correct me.
Proven child molesters deserve death. Its a serious charge. It should be considered seriously.
Joel