i can understand many argue that scientifically it is impossible for the earth to remain forever (sun dies).
what is wrong with the argument that god could refuel the sun?.
Undercover:
*** g03 9/22 p. 21 Science Was My Religion ***
Furthermore, a creative day as understood by the ancients can mean an epoch of extended duration, in much the same way as the terms “period” and “era” are used by science in describing earth history. Thus, the Bible is not at odds with scientific findings. It indicates that the creative days lasted aeons.
okay here is my thread to discuss this.
i believe the bible is inspired by god and reliable.
many argue it's neither.
2 Now the earth proved to be formless and waste and there was darkness upon the surface of [the] watery deep; and God’s active force was moving to and fro over the surface of the waters.
3 And God proceeded to say: “Let light come to be.” Then there came to be light.
How do we know verse 3 means that let light come to be isn't from the perspective from on earth? Couldn't something have been blocking the light during these creative events? Whether on earth or between the sun and the earth?
i can understand many argue that scientifically it is impossible for the earth to remain forever (sun dies).
what is wrong with the argument that god could refuel the sun?.
If God is perfect and his creation is perfect, why should he have to refuel anything?
That's a good thought.
Some immediate thoughts come to my mind (not saying they are right):
How do we really know that there isn't already something different about the sun than all the other stars in the solar system? I'd be interested if this can be disproven.
How do we know that angles don't have the assignment to prevent the star from dying. I know this is out in left field but according to the bible we will never fully understand the creation of Jehovah.
Also, isn't most of what we know about a star's life-cycle from what we observe about others? How many years into the past have those events been? How sure are we that the "time-machine" of space observation is how things are currently happening now? Could there have been other physical laws in place before jehovah was done with creation? I know this is all specultive. I'm just saying we don't know everything.
i can understand many argue that scientifically it is impossible for the earth to remain forever (sun dies).
what is wrong with the argument that god could refuel the sun?.
Sorry you found my response impolite, but an JW apologists that claims to understand things that won't do basic research on his own shouldn't get info spoonfed.
Maybe the term "refuel" isn't the best one to use. Couldn't Jehovah do whatever is needed to prevent the sun from dying? Since he wrote the laws of physics couldn't he circumvent them? Couldn't the creator of the sun prevent it from dying? Arguing this is like saying he could not part the red sea or give Jesus the power to turn water in to wine or resurrect the dead. If these things could happen and since the bible says the earth will remain forever, why is it so hard to think the "impossible" could happen. Perhaps you don't believe that the red sea was parted or the water turned to wine or that people where resurrected. To each the own I suppose.
okay here is my thread to discuss this.
i believe the bible is inspired by god and reliable.
many argue it's neither.
For you to actually KNOW that the bible writer spoke about FUTURE events in ADVANCE of them happening wouldn't you need to know exactly WHEN they wrote?
You asked what would make me not believe. I told you. Can you proove that the bible did not accurately fortell the future, like Jeruselum's destruction as you allude to in your post?
i'm beginning to have some doubts about my doubts.
this subject is one of them.. many argue that it is unfair, unloving, and unjust for god to destroy 99.9% of all mankind at armageddon.
but didn't this happen before in the days of noah?
Ynot. The fact I'm here shows I don't agree with everything the WTS says, otherwise I wouldn't be here. However, critial thinking is not the same thing as being independent of God in our thinking as Adam and Eve choose to be.
okay here is my thread to discuss this.
i believe the bible is inspired by god and reliable.
many argue it's neither.
WHAT would it take for you to NOT believe the Bible is the word of God?
Undeniable proof that it did not accurately predict the future.
i'm beginning to have some doubts about my doubts.
this subject is one of them.. many argue that it is unfair, unloving, and unjust for god to destroy 99.9% of all mankind at armageddon.
but didn't this happen before in the days of noah?
And what's wrong with that? It's how children grow into self sufficient individuals. It's just part of the process. If they never test the waters, never explore on their own, how solid is their foundation?
What if they independently think that they should drink and drive, despite being told otherwise. Would you say this is just part of the process, laying a solid foundation? What if they kill someone or themselves?
i'm beginning to have some doubts about my doubts.
this subject is one of them.. many argue that it is unfair, unloving, and unjust for god to destroy 99.9% of all mankind at armageddon.
but didn't this happen before in the days of noah?
Which rules did he make?
Why would God enforce them?
For Adam and Eve it was not to eat of the tree of knowledge of Good and Bad. He enforced the 'law' because if he did not then he would indeed have lied to them as Satan slandered.
i'm beginning to have some doubts about my doubts.
this subject is one of them.. many argue that it is unfair, unloving, and unjust for god to destroy 99.9% of all mankind at armageddon.
but didn't this happen before in the days of noah?
Second, the act of creating does NOT give him the right to terminate our lives because he gave us FREE WILL.
I don't agree. He makes the rules, why can't he inforce them?
Third, thinking independently is not rebellion. It simply isn't.
Well I guess some definition of what is meant by independent thinking would be helpful, but consider this. Don't most teenagers get to a point where they starting having independent thinking in the form of thinking they know better than their parents, perhaps that they know everything so to speak? What does this usually lead to? Isn't it rebellion? So if one thinks independently of God how is that any different?
Know I will agree that critial thinking is not the same as rebellion. How can it be?
