Can't argue with that. There was a doco on TV about the Bible a couple of years ago that basically stated everything you have, but lol, I can't remember the name of it. Anyway, you will know it if you ever watch it, lol.
transhuman68
JoinedPosts by transhuman68
-
3
What I know so far..
by Crazyguy inits been about a year and a half since i started being on this site.
before i came to this site i had already blown up in my mind several of the key teachings of the org.
the final ones were their teaching on christ being the mediator only for the 144k and all it entails, they also only being in the new covenant etc.
-
-
-
24
Solomon's Temple was there one??
by Crazyguy inits interesting to find out that there is no evidence of king david or his son solomon.
what about this amazing temple that solomon supposedly built??
there is no arcylogical evidence that it ever excisted either.
-
-
transhuman68
You are a champion, WMF!
-
24
Solomon's Temple was there one??
by Crazyguy inits interesting to find out that there is no evidence of king david or his son solomon.
what about this amazing temple that solomon supposedly built??
there is no arcylogical evidence that it ever excisted either.
-
-
transhuman68
The Ezra verse is interesting. When Herod's temple was destroyed in 70 A.D. even the Roman army couldn't destroy it completely, and one wall, a tower, and all the foundations remained- so there should have been at least the foundations after the Babylonians destroyed 'Solomon's temple'- but as that verse shows there was nothing. Very strange, lol.
-
23
Jw's dont really care about doctrine do they?
by marriedtoajw init seems to me that jw's really don't care about doctrine.
ephesians chapter 4 verse 11 "and he gave some as apostles others as prophets, others as evangelists, others as pastors and teachers to equip the holy ones for the work of ministry for the building up of the body of christ until we attain the unity of faith and knowledge of the son of god to mature manhood to the extent of the full stature of christ so that we may no longer be in infants tost by waves and swept along by every wind of teaching arising from human trickery from their cunning in the interest of deceitful scheming".
is it just me or does this verse totally annihilate the doctrine or belief in new light.
-
-
transhuman68
That is a great scripture. The WT doctrine has always been so complicated that people who join have to have faith in the GB's claim to be spirit-directed, or whatever it is they claim, as there is no way anyone would come up with those beliefs just from reading the Bible alone: and from there is it just a small step to accepting all the 'new light' as correct as well. So the actual doctrines aren't important once that dependency has been established.
-
52
Bible's mention of physical beauty- why?
by Magnum infor years, as i've read through the bible, i've wondered why bible writers were concerned about physical beauty (see references below)?
i realize it's human nature to be interested in beauty, but why did they see fit to record in the so-called "word of god" the fact that some of the people they wrote about were beautiful?
looks are not supposed to matter according to jw doctrine (and probably the doctrine of many christian-professing sects).
-
-
transhuman68
Yes, the NT is much different to the OT, but the Hebrew Scriptures must have been a lot different before the Exile too, as much of it was written or rewritten at that time or just after. It's as if every time Jerusalem was destroyed the shock caused a huge change in religious thinking. Probably the ancient inhabitants of Judah had a more enjoyable life worshipping their fertility gods than the later repressed Christians did! Many beliefs changed over the time that the Bible was written- about sex, the status of women, and the afterlife etc. You can't imagine Paul writing the Song of Solomon! Ecclesiastes 3:18-22 is an example of no belief in an afterlife from a much earlier time.
-
71
Kate Wild
by quellycatface ini've been given permission to post news of our friend.. kate hasn't been very well.
not well at all.
i think much of it has been a delayed reaction to her df'ing, the general fallout when leaving the wtbs and family issues.. i just wanted to give you guys the heads up and give you a chance to show how much we care about her.. thanks for listening..
-
-
transhuman68
What they said. We all miss you, KW.
-
19
BACH PARTITAS FOR SOLO VIOLIN
by hamsterbait ini have gotten soooo fed up of trying to sift my way through hundreds of items on amazon, that i am now sick to death, and wishing jsb were never even born (may almighty god forbid) - please note my posy reference to islamic philosophy:).
i want a good recording of the bach partitas for solo violin played by a really good musician on a baroque violin with good stylistic training.. any takers??.
make a hamster happy :(.
-
-
transhuman68
Did you hear about the violin-playing dog?
His Bach was worse than his bite, lol.
-
52
Bible's mention of physical beauty- why?
by Magnum infor years, as i've read through the bible, i've wondered why bible writers were concerned about physical beauty (see references below)?
i realize it's human nature to be interested in beauty, but why did they see fit to record in the so-called "word of god" the fact that some of the people they wrote about were beautiful?
looks are not supposed to matter according to jw doctrine (and probably the doctrine of many christian-professing sects).
-
-
transhuman68
Writing stories about 'beautiful people', and inserting lots of gratuitous sex & violence was considered by the ancient Jewish writers to be the best way to get their scrolls onto the bestseller list, lol. They didn't have TV and 'Dallas' back then. The OP actually shows the difference between the OT & the NT- the Jewish writers included beautiful women and lots of sex, whereas the Christian writers thought 'spiritual qualities' were beautiful, and sex was verboten. Maybe being beautiful meant a person was blessed by god? IDK...Anything is possible- the Buybull is loopy...
-
26
Just Realised I have been on here for 5 years now
by cantleave inhow time flies......... ..... and armageddon still hasn't come..
-
-
transhuman68
Congratulations, lol.
-
8
Can you choose what you believe?
by noonehome ini hear it all the time.. people who decide it isn't the truth and leave are said to deep down know they're leaving the truth, choosing instead whatever ideology suits their imperfect desires.
in the new dvd the little kid asks why people believe in evolution and the dad basically says people believe whatever they want.
the actual issue is never actually addresed though: "did life evolve?
-
-
transhuman68
It’s a good question. Religion is an 'optional extra' in life- it's not necessary for our survival and there are no immediate consequences for choosing one religion or another, so people really don’t look at it objectively, preferring to go with what ‘feels right’, rather than what can be proved right by years of open-minded research and questioning.
I guess many people stay in religions or join a different one because of the ‘feel-good’ factor- the rituals, the fellowship, and trusting in some higher intellect- whether that is the elders, a priest, or ‘god’- because feeling confident and motivated in life is very important. People will choose to more or less believe in their religion because the pay-off is there.
Searching for actual facts, and sorting truth from myths, making decisions for yourself- that is a much different experience and requires a whole different mindset.