Thanks for posting this, Barbara.
Just my 2 cents:
I thought it was interesting watching the JW lawyer from the "otherside". Boy, was he a walking, talking, bethelite clone. He sounded articulate and had all his court cases in hand to back up his claims. But listening to his content, he wasn't really addressing the issues they had appealed, just blowing their own horn that JW's have 1st admendment privileges. I thought at first the 3 judges were impressed with the JW background but when Ed Bell was done with his explanation of the brief, I think they had a different idea about what the lawsuit was about.
It will be very interesting to hear what the appelate court's judgement will be.
You and Joe keep up the good work and excellent example you are setting for all to see.
Hugs,
Joy