Mary said: If he accepts a blood transfusion to try and save his life, he will be murdered by God at Armageddon and will never get a resurrection---his eternal salvation is in [jeopardy].
djeggnog said: You don't know this to be true and I don't either.
Then perhaps you should try reading what your gods in Crooklyn say about this very subject eggnog:
Questions from Readers:"In view of the seriousness of taking blood into the human system by a transfusion, would violation of the Holy Scriptures in this regard subject the dedicated, baptized receiver of blood transfusion to being disfellowshipped from the Christian congregation? The inspired Holy Scriptures answer yes."-----Watchtower, January 15, 1961, p. 63
"They know that if they violate God's law on blood and the child dies in the process, they have endangered that child's opportunity for everlasting life in God's new world......it may result in the immediate and very temporary prolongation of life, but that at the cost of eternal life for a dedicated Christian."-----Blood, Medicine, and the Law of God, p.54
djegghead then said: His oncologist was evidently powerless to save him
No he wasn't 'powerless to save him' had he been allowed to take the needed transfusions. His bone marrow was completely shot. He need blood and no blood substitute would work in a case like his. Which part of that don't you understand?
but the doctor was perfectly willing to transfuse blood in violation of God's command to the world since Noah stepped off the ark in an attempt to try to give your brother a few additional years of life and at what cost to the doctor?
Of course the doctor was willing to transfuse blood because a) doctors are trained to save lives---they're not there to watch people being forced to commit suicide like the Organization demands. And b) there is no 'command from God' that humans cannot transfuse blood from one live human to another, found anywhere in the bible. And by the way, that command that God gave to Noah did not apply to the entire human race. If you bothered to actually read the bible, you'll see that the Israelites were allowed to sell unbled meat to foreigners:
"...YOU must not eat any body [already] dead. To the alien resident who is inside your gates you may give it, and he must eat it; or there may be a selling of it to a foreigner, because you are a holy people to Jehovah your God..."---Deut. 14:21
egghead said: but if a blood transfusion lowers the immune response, making it harder to fight infections -- and it does! -- and it predisposes a sick patient for the inset of infections that their immune system could have fought off were it not for the transfused blood having been introduced into the patient body, what guarantee did the oncologist give him that he would survive until the bone marrow transplant had been administered?
Your statement is so riciulous on so many levels it's hard to know where to even start. First of all, blood transfusions do not automatically lower the recipients' immune system, or virutally everyone whose ever had a BT would be six feet under. It lowers the immune system when it's not a proper match whereby it triggers a response from the patient's own immune system. The destruction of incompatible red blood cells is called a hemolytic transfusion reaction, the destruction of incompatible white blood cells causes a febrile non-hemolytic transfusion reaction (FNHTR), and the destruction of incompatible platelets causes post-transfusion purpura. No one here is denying that this doesn't happen on occassion, but YOU are trying to make it sound that every single time a person receives a blood transfusion, their immune system is automatically lowered.
This was the scenario: He did not have enough red cells, white cells or platelets to survive the chemotherapy treatment. In order for him to survive, he required several transfusions during the chemo treatment, which people do all the time. Please don't try and make it sound as though his body would somehow have been more able to fight off infections without the required blood because to anyone who has more that two brains cells working (which I doubt you have), that does not happen for someone whose own body isn't producing enough mature cells anymore. This was his only shot at saving his life you moron, yet the Govering Body members would prefer to see you die a shitty death needlessly rather than admit that they've been wrong all these years.
There are no 'guarantees' in life, but since he had a family member who was an exact match for the stem cell transplant, he would have had an excellent chance at surviving had it not been for the blood doctrine.
I know you're bitter, that you hate Jehovah's Witnesses, that you hate "the cult" to which your brother belonged, that you hate the governing body of Jehovah's Witnesses, and I'm one of Jehovah's Witnesses, so you hate me, too, and I know that I would be dead right now if you could choke me out, or stab me to death or you'd empty all 17 rounds of a Glock 9mm into my body
Oh Christ......are you trying to get in your daily 'persecution fix' eggnog? I have no desire to kill you or choke you or stab you or 'empty all 17 rounds of a Glock 9mm' into your body-----where do you come up with this shit? I think you're an idiot, a brainwashed fool but as for killing you? Can't say I'd ever consider it. As for hating the Govering Body---you at least got that one right. They're the ones that make the rules that has killed tens of thousands of Witnesses over the year and what I'd like to see happen to them is that they be charged with Assisted Suicide every time a Witness dies for refusing a blood transfusion that could have saved their lives. They'd be getting "New Light" pretty damn quick on the subject.
we believe in things like free will, in not violating one's own conscience, and we also believe in a person's right to make informed choices.
ROFLMAO! Free will? Ya right. The WTS believes in about as much Free Will as what the Third Reich did. As long as you obey the leaders, don't read any books that are unfavourable to them and never ask too many disturbing questions, then yes---you can live under the delusion that you actually have 'free will'. You most certainly do not believe in letting a person decide life and death matters by using their own conscience as I already showed you from your own stinking literature that accepting transfusions is a disfellowshipping offense and that you are 'jeapordizing your eternal salvation'by doing so.
You believe in stripping folks of their right to self-determination
Oh my holy god. This, coming from a guy who belongs to a religion that forces their members to committ suicide when a perfectly viable treatment can save their lives? The Watchtower Society does not allow their followers the "right to self-determination", because if they did---they wouldn't disfellowship people who were guided by their own conscience!
That there are men -- soldiers that have returned from the war in Iraq -- that were faced with the choice of having both of their legs amputated or dying in a number of days or weeks from the inset of wet gangrene in them that have chosen to die because they did not wish live the reset of their lives without legs and believed their wives deserved a whole man. They died so that the family could move on.
Your drone above bears absolutely no resemblance to what happened to my brother in law. He was not a vegetable or a war amputee and he would not have been any "burden" to my sister. He simply needed the BTs to get him through so that the stem cell transplant would grow new bone marrow for him. Where do you come up with this shit?
Your brother died because of his love for God. How ridiculous is that?
No, he died because he was born and raised in this cult that allow no free will or self-preservation. These things are all sacrificed on the alter to a bunch of senile, gross old men who are far more interested in retaining their power over 7 millions lives, than to give a crap about how many of them actually die.
Eggnog, you're an asshole, plain and simple. You have no real convictions other than the tripe you read in the Craptower magazine and are little more than a zombie for the Borg. I guess this is the easiest way for you to get your time in on your Field Serve-Us Report because you obviously aren't spending any time at the meetings or knocking on doors. Gee.....what would the Govering Body say if they knew you were visiting and associating with 'apostates'?