Hi Joey jo jo
I certainly haven't done the research into this that thirdwitness has.
For the record witnesses say and I agree that any interpretation of Bible prophecy is only a "Ccurrent understanding" prophecy is subjective. We have to research the Bible and correlate that with fulfillment in the world around us so it is not an exact science (nor is it meant to be) but unity demands we have to be in agreement with each other as Christians and I think the "times" prophecy is a solid one.
For the record others throughout history have recognised it's significance as a prophecy but haven't beed able to connect all the dots. I could be wrong but I think Martin Luther also attempted chronology on "times"
The use of "times" by Daniel and Jesus who uniquely mentions "Daniel" as a bible book and it's usage in Revelation by John I think is too significant to ignore.
secular evidence apposing the bible is simply one alternate source from stone tablets that is liable to human error but that is rarely mentioned. Daniels time frames are known to be accurate.
The bible holds a lot of prophecies as Jesus himself revealed which "tense" is never really an issue since Jesus fulfilled prophecies written about David apparently for David himself in the present, past or future tense.
Bible chronology is an established biblical practise from Daniel itself by the jews that were in expectation of Jesus as messiah from it.
"lowliest" is in it's first fulfilment a reference to king Neb a singular person. I'm surprised some translations make it plural anyway?
Did that answer your points Joey?