Hi Faithful Witness, What do you think of the following counter arguments:
Faithful Witness - she is going to talk again about the analogy of a "jigsaw puzzle," and trynig to get a specific piece to fit just right. "It looks like it's the right piece, and it actually fits, but when I looked at it closer, I realized it was the wrong piece." I don't see her coming to a conclusion on this analogy, but merely using it as a method to confuse me.
Your jigsaw puzzles analogy can be used to solve problems using the scientific method of making systematic observations, measurements, and experiments, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses to determine if an hypothesis fits the facts/observations. Even an incorrect hypothesis can lead to the truth.
Have you heard of the problem-solving principle of Ockham's razor - all things being equal the hypothesis with the fewest assumptions is usually the correct one? More complicated solutions may ultimately prove correct, but—in the absence of certainty—the fewer assumptions that are made, the better.
Faithful Witness - "each person has to come to their own conclusion about what they believe..."
I totally agree with you about each person must come to their own conclusions about what they believe. If I decide to become baptized as a JW, how would other JWs treat me if I change my mind and no longer believe that the WTBTS is "God's sole channel" or tell other JWs that the Watchtower is wrong about what they teach? [Have a copy of the "When Someone We Love Leaves Jehovah", 15 July 2011 Watchtower (Study Edition), page 30-32] Would you shun your children if they no longer believe that the WTBTS is "God's sole channel'? (pause wait for your elderette to respond) Don't you feel that shunning people or not associating with them just because they believe differently than you is contrary to God's two greatist commandments?
Peace be with you and everyone, who you love,
Robert