But...
xchange
JoinedPosts by xchange
-
-
-
-
22
What is faith?
by Seraphim23 in[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:officedocumentsettings> <o:allowpng /> </o:officedocumentsettings> </xml><![endif].
[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:trackmoves /> <w:trackformatting /> <w:punctuationkerning /> <w:validateagainstschemas /> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext> <w:donotpromoteqf /> <w:lidthemeother>en-gb</w:lidthemeother> <w:lidthemeasian>x-none</w:lidthemeasian> <w:lidthemecomplexscript>x-none</w:lidthemecomplexscript> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> <w:dontgrowautofit /> <w:splitpgbreakandparamark /> <w:enableopentypekerning /> <w:dontflipmirrorindents /> <w:overridetablestylehps /> </w:compatibility> <m:mathpr> <m:mathfont m:val="cambria math" /> <m:brkbin m:val="before" /> <m:brkbinsub m:val="--" /> <m:smallfrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispdef /> <m:lmargin m:val="0" /> <m:rmargin m:val="0" /> <m:defjc m:val="centergroup" /> <m:wrapindent m:val="1440" /> <m:intlim m:val="subsup" /> <m:narylim m:val="undovr" /> </m:mathpr></w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!
-
-
xchange
Faith is suspending reality and claiming/asserting your belief of x,y,z based on your feelings and mere opinion with no rational method of testing your belief.
-
136
After the cult how many reject faith in anything?
by Seraphim23 in[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:officedocumentsettings> <o:relyonvml /> <o:allowpng /> </o:officedocumentsettings> </xml><![endif].
[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:trackmoves /> <w:trackformatting /> <w:punctuationkerning /> <w:validateagainstschemas /> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext> <w:donotpromoteqf /> <w:lidthemeother>en-gb</w:lidthemeother> <w:lidthemeasian>x-none</w:lidthemeasian> <w:lidthemecomplexscript>x-none</w:lidthemecomplexscript> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> <w:dontgrowautofit /> <w:splitpgbreakandparamark /> <w:enableopentypekerning /> <w:dontflipmirrorindents /> <w:overridetablestylehps /> </w:compatibility> <m:mathpr> <m:mathfont m:val="cambria math" /> <m:brkbin m:val="before" /> <m:brkbinsub m:val="--" /> <m:smallfrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispdef /> <m:lmargin m:val="0" /> <m:rmargin m:val="0" /> <m:defjc m:val="centergroup" /> <m:wrapindent m:val="1440" /> <m:intlim m:val="subsup" /> <m:narylim m:val="undovr" /> </m:mathpr></w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* style definitions */ table.msonormaltable {mso-style-name:"table normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-language:en-us;} </style> <![endif].
-
-
xchange
JeffJ
Most everything you do requires faith, whether it is called by that name, a theory, truth or just a guess. You go deep enough and it always requires faith.
No. Wrong. Very, very wrong. How do you even go 'deep enough' with yourself anyways?
-
-
-
xchange
Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice.............nothing.
God, God, God.........nothing.*
Just what I thought.
* All monikers invoked.
-
9
Jesus turns up at Kingdom Hall - brothers ordered not to treat him "with partiality" because of his looks (and beard)
by cedars inhi folks.
the new june 15th watchtower is now on jw.org in case you are interested!
here is the link... http://download.jw.org/files/media_magazines/28/w_e_20130615.pdf.
-
-
xchange
Well if Dave Grohl walked in the KH, not only would I shake his hand but get on my hands and knees and do acts of obeisance to him. He is of course the only true god.
-
32
Sign Languae is a True Language,Urgues Prof. Harlan Lane
by Scott77 inprofessor harlan lane recently published a book that looked at whether deaf people have their own culture.
lane, a psychology professor at northeastern university, has been studying deaf culture and linguistics since the 1970s, ever since he witnessed a deaf duo conversing and was stunned to learn of the depth and complexity of asl.
here is his interview wth the boston globe... .
-
-
xchange
Ahh ...it never gets old. Nice FX!
-
32
Sign Languae is a True Language,Urgues Prof. Harlan Lane
by Scott77 inprofessor harlan lane recently published a book that looked at whether deaf people have their own culture.
lane, a psychology professor at northeastern university, has been studying deaf culture and linguistics since the 1970s, ever since he witnessed a deaf duo conversing and was stunned to learn of the depth and complexity of asl.
here is his interview wth the boston globe... .
-
-
xchange
@jgnat
That's exactly how it transpired. Everyone was laughing so hard. I lost count of how many times it was replayed, freeze framed and frame-by-frame dissection.
@ Gojira_101 PM response
-
32
Sign Languae is a True Language,Urgues Prof. Harlan Lane
by Scott77 inprofessor harlan lane recently published a book that looked at whether deaf people have their own culture.
lane, a psychology professor at northeastern university, has been studying deaf culture and linguistics since the 1970s, ever since he witnessed a deaf duo conversing and was stunned to learn of the depth and complexity of asl.
here is his interview wth the boston globe... .
-
-
xchange
I'm actually an certified ASL interpreter
Hey. Same here. The world just got significantly smaller. Canada or States?
-
32
Sign Languae is a True Language,Urgues Prof. Harlan Lane
by Scott77 inprofessor harlan lane recently published a book that looked at whether deaf people have their own culture.
lane, a psychology professor at northeastern university, has been studying deaf culture and linguistics since the 1970s, ever since he witnessed a deaf duo conversing and was stunned to learn of the depth and complexity of asl.
here is his interview wth the boston globe... .
-
-
xchange
However , more than anything else, it offended them.
While I'm sure there might have been a few people offended, by and large, the community I'm in and others I am in touch with simply laughed at it and mocked it. It's kind of turned into a trademark of the organization now. One joke is how that video clip is useful in teaching proper techniques for pleasuring yourself.
As to the OP, I agree with what others have said and that this story is old news. In fact, William Stokoe in the 60's investigated sign language and determined it to be a bona fide language on par with spoken languages, albeit in a different medium.
There are basically two approaches in Deaf education. The aural-oral approach and the visual language approach. Both have merits and drawbacks. But the biggest advantage in exposing deaf babies to a visual language is that they 'get' a language right away. There are many D/deaf people out there that are/were languageless for many years because of the aural-oral approach. That is because so much time is spent on developing skills for vocalization, optimizing hearing, lip-reading etc - ie. the mechanics of spoken language. Mind you, this was more of a problem in the early 70's - 90's. Now days, things are better for deaf education with a lot more options. But the two opposing camps remain.
-
273
greatest show on earth
by unstopableravens ini wanted to start this thread two weeks ago,however i have had alot going on with wifey and the elders,that is another thread.
to be honest my mind has been on my family.
i will be able to discuss the book tommorow morning.
-
-
xchange
It answers the big question of beginnings, which atheism cannot answer.
Theism answers the cause for the effect. Atheism does not. For atheism, there was either no cause, or this universe is one of an infinite number, and thus is able to avoid confronting any beginning cause, or what happened before the beginning.
Just another gentle reminder for our readers. Atheism is only a position in the disbelief in the claims ('there are gods') made by theists. It has no position on how the universe came to be. Subtle distinction but an important one. Atheism doesn't answer questions, it does the questioning.