I'd say, "Welcome back to reality!".
I have a whack of siblings and I don't harbour any grudges against any of them. I was, after all, one of them at one point.
i pondered on a rather strange idea (sort of a divided feeling) today after reading an article and i wondered how all of you would react.
in the unlikely event the ivory towers of wathtower came crashing down (not literally) lets just say there was a mass awakening.
for those of you who have suffered from atrocious behavior from friends and family, how would you really react?
I'd say, "Welcome back to reality!".
I have a whack of siblings and I don't harbour any grudges against any of them. I was, after all, one of them at one point.
But...
[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:officedocumentsettings> <o:allowpng /> </o:officedocumentsettings> </xml><![endif].
[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:trackmoves /> <w:trackformatting /> <w:punctuationkerning /> <w:validateagainstschemas /> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext> <w:donotpromoteqf /> <w:lidthemeother>en-gb</w:lidthemeother> <w:lidthemeasian>x-none</w:lidthemeasian> <w:lidthemecomplexscript>x-none</w:lidthemecomplexscript> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> <w:dontgrowautofit /> <w:splitpgbreakandparamark /> <w:enableopentypekerning /> <w:dontflipmirrorindents /> <w:overridetablestylehps /> </w:compatibility> <m:mathpr> <m:mathfont m:val="cambria math" /> <m:brkbin m:val="before" /> <m:brkbinsub m:val="--" /> <m:smallfrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispdef /> <m:lmargin m:val="0" /> <m:rmargin m:val="0" /> <m:defjc m:val="centergroup" /> <m:wrapindent m:val="1440" /> <m:intlim m:val="subsup" /> <m:narylim m:val="undovr" /> </m:mathpr></w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!
Faith is suspending reality and claiming/asserting your belief of x,y,z based on your feelings and mere opinion with no rational method of testing your belief.
[if gte mso 9]><xml> <o:officedocumentsettings> <o:relyonvml /> <o:allowpng /> </o:officedocumentsettings> </xml><![endif].
[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:worddocument> <w:view>normal</w:view> <w:zoom>0</w:zoom> <w:trackmoves /> <w:trackformatting /> <w:punctuationkerning /> <w:validateagainstschemas /> <w:saveifxmlinvalid>false</w:saveifxmlinvalid> <w:ignoremixedcontent>false</w:ignoremixedcontent> <w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext>false</w:alwaysshowplaceholdertext> <w:donotpromoteqf /> <w:lidthemeother>en-gb</w:lidthemeother> <w:lidthemeasian>x-none</w:lidthemeasian> <w:lidthemecomplexscript>x-none</w:lidthemecomplexscript> <w:compatibility> <w:breakwrappedtables /> <w:snaptogridincell /> <w:wraptextwithpunct /> <w:useasianbreakrules /> <w:dontgrowautofit /> <w:splitpgbreakandparamark /> <w:enableopentypekerning /> <w:dontflipmirrorindents /> <w:overridetablestylehps /> </w:compatibility> <m:mathpr> <m:mathfont m:val="cambria math" /> <m:brkbin m:val="before" /> <m:brkbinsub m:val="--" /> <m:smallfrac m:val="off" /> <m:dispdef /> <m:lmargin m:val="0" /> <m:rmargin m:val="0" /> <m:defjc m:val="centergroup" /> <m:wrapindent m:val="1440" /> <m:intlim m:val="subsup" /> <m:narylim m:val="undovr" /> </m:mathpr></w:worddocument> </xml><!
[endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* style definitions */ table.msonormaltable {mso-style-name:"table normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-priority:99; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; mso-para-margin-top:0cm; mso-para-margin-right:0cm; mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt; mso-para-margin-left:0cm; line-height:115%; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:11.0pt; font-family:"calibri","sans-serif"; mso-ascii-font-family:calibri; mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-hansi-font-family:calibri; mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin; mso-fareast-language:en-us;} </style> <![endif].
JeffJ
Most everything you do requires faith, whether it is called by that name, a theory, truth or just a guess. You go deep enough and it always requires faith.
No. Wrong. Very, very wrong. How do you even go 'deep enough' with yourself anyways?
Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice, Beetlejuice.............nothing.
God, God, God.........nothing.*
Just what I thought.
* All monikers invoked.
hi folks.
the new june 15th watchtower is now on jw.org in case you are interested!
here is the link... http://download.jw.org/files/media_magazines/28/w_e_20130615.pdf.
Well if Dave Grohl walked in the KH, not only would I shake his hand but get on my hands and knees and do acts of obeisance to him. He is of course the only true god.
professor harlan lane recently published a book that looked at whether deaf people have their own culture.
lane, a psychology professor at northeastern university, has been studying deaf culture and linguistics since the 1970s, ever since he witnessed a deaf duo conversing and was stunned to learn of the depth and complexity of asl.
here is his interview wth the boston globe... .
Ahh ...it never gets old. Nice FX!
professor harlan lane recently published a book that looked at whether deaf people have their own culture.
lane, a psychology professor at northeastern university, has been studying deaf culture and linguistics since the 1970s, ever since he witnessed a deaf duo conversing and was stunned to learn of the depth and complexity of asl.
here is his interview wth the boston globe... .
@jgnat
That's exactly how it transpired. Everyone was laughing so hard. I lost count of how many times it was replayed, freeze framed and frame-by-frame dissection.
@ Gojira_101 PM response
professor harlan lane recently published a book that looked at whether deaf people have their own culture.
lane, a psychology professor at northeastern university, has been studying deaf culture and linguistics since the 1970s, ever since he witnessed a deaf duo conversing and was stunned to learn of the depth and complexity of asl.
here is his interview wth the boston globe... .
I'm actually an certified ASL interpreter
Hey. Same here. The world just got significantly smaller. Canada or States?
professor harlan lane recently published a book that looked at whether deaf people have their own culture.
lane, a psychology professor at northeastern university, has been studying deaf culture and linguistics since the 1970s, ever since he witnessed a deaf duo conversing and was stunned to learn of the depth and complexity of asl.
here is his interview wth the boston globe... .
However , more than anything else, it offended them.
While I'm sure there might have been a few people offended, by and large, the community I'm in and others I am in touch with simply laughed at it and mocked it. It's kind of turned into a trademark of the organization now. One joke is how that video clip is useful in teaching proper techniques for pleasuring yourself.
As to the OP, I agree with what others have said and that this story is old news. In fact, William Stokoe in the 60's investigated sign language and determined it to be a bona fide language on par with spoken languages, albeit in a different medium.
There are basically two approaches in Deaf education. The aural-oral approach and the visual language approach. Both have merits and drawbacks. But the biggest advantage in exposing deaf babies to a visual language is that they 'get' a language right away. There are many D/deaf people out there that are/were languageless for many years because of the aural-oral approach. That is because so much time is spent on developing skills for vocalization, optimizing hearing, lip-reading etc - ie. the mechanics of spoken language. Mind you, this was more of a problem in the early 70's - 90's. Now days, things are better for deaf education with a lot more options. But the two opposing camps remain.