"I think sometimes the courts get fooled by the Witness lies that their adherents are "informed".
I agree with Wobble. There was a case last year in Canada where a teen sued because she was forced a blood transfusion. The province had to pay her $450,000 court fees, and ruled that her rights weren't violated. But they said that lower courts from now on need to consider the maturity and decision-making skills of minors before they force medical treatment on them. http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/06/26/supreme-blood026.html
I feel this is so wrong. I was taught at a young age from the platform how to refuse a blood transfusion, and what to say if I needed to argue my viewpoint in court. The same reasoning I was taught was used by the teen in the above case: "I don't want to die, which is why I went to the hospital for treatment. I just wanted the best medical treatment without blood." I was taught that same line, word for word, 15 years ago. The witnesses can fool the court, making them believe they know what their choice means. But it took me 28 years to realize that the WT is not God's organization. Obviously my thinking ablitliy and decision-making skills weren't functioning properly until I woke up and realized I'd been sadly mislead my entire life. I would have fought to avoid a blood transfusion without fully understanding why, or how the scripture I would quote was taken out of context.