Thankyou for all the work you put into the summary. The WTBTS is not making itself look good through this appeal.
Regarding -
A. Duty applied to the Watchtower
They are admitting that they may have had a moral responsibility to action and failed but because their was no legal obligation they should be let off the hook. If it is by their 'works' that they vindicate themselves as being above every other religion then they are failing because their actions show that they don't take their moral responsibilities seriously. It also demonstrates how their actions are not being guided by Holy Spirit otherwise they would have known how to deal with abuse issues in a wisely manner.
I understand that in at least one state there is a 'good samaritan' principle. The law is supposed to be about justice. If by someone's inaction another person is injured then there should be a recourse. It seems their only recourse regarding their inaction is because they felt they had no legal responsibility.
Even if they win this case they have shown clearly how they neglected to act as true Christians.
B. Exclusion of Parties from Jury Verdict Form
Such a fine representation they make of themselves, let's point the fingure elsewhere and put the blame on others.
C. Government entanglement with religion
Sounds like they feel they should be above the law. The case is about a religion having some responsibility in protecting an individual and yet the WTBTS would like to establish the idea that it does not.