You're deluded and it was just a one off, personal experience that you had.
You're relative was basically calling you a liar.
here's a conversation i just had with my relative a few minutes ago i'll let you decide.. relative : would you like to read your grandfather the days txt (she passes joe the phone).
joe : sure.
(then proceed to read it to my grandfather and explain it).. after discussing the points joe says to relative.. hey what's the story arnt they printing books any more.. relative : no they arnt necessary any more.. joe : really why is that.. relative : it's all on line.
You're deluded and it was just a one off, personal experience that you had.
You're relative was basically calling you a liar.
well the ball has started rolling, gonna sue, can't go into to much detail.
time for some payback .
All the best Moley. You know where it hurts them the most, not so much the money but having to reveal information they want hidden. I bet their settlement offers have tripled these days. I'm sure your lawyers should be able to get some advice from the Zelken lawyers if you're not using them already.
the november 2016 watchtower is now available and it has more new light but i can't quite figure out what they are saying.
it relates to when the jws were released from the captivity of babylon the great (false religion).
i am not attempting to discuss that in this post.
DOC - BIG F...ING DEAL!
I'm sure no one really gave a sh!t then either, but to be waving it like a flag at this point in time is simply BS. Anyone who even saw the tract, or who thought they were accomplishing something by distributing them, IS DEAD. It was all a waste of time as, once again, nothing happened -- and now, 100 years later, still nothing has happened.
YAWN!
Doc
The point of the article was to prove that they had been very active in getting out of false religion during the years 1918 to 1919. The previous Governing Body, probably Franz & Co. had taught that the org was captive of Babylon the Great during those years.
They presented it as new light earlier this year in a QFR and have gone into more detail in this article. All they are really doing is arguing with the teachings of a previous Governing Body, showing that they know better than them.
It is no big deal and all that they printed way back then is not even in print today.
the november 2016 watchtower is now available and it has more new light but i can't quite figure out what they are saying.
it relates to when the jws were released from the captivity of babylon the great (false religion).
i am not attempting to discuss that in this post.
Data Dog, what you say is very insightful and for the most part, accurate.
I love your point about them showing a DA letter being read out in front of a church by a woman. It further distances it as being applicable in their own religion.
Having been in a physically abusive relationship I can say that this is not true of me and I believe many other females, we don't love it, want it, need it or feel special. Men can take on such a dominating role that it is very difficult to leave. The biggest reason I found it hard to leave was out of fear for my life. Fortunately I had a friend who was able to help me get away but not without more violence. The police said we shouldn't lay charges, a lawyer advised me not to get a restraining order as it might incite more violence (and he did not charge me for his services). I had nightmares for years afterwards even though I had left no trail of my whereabouts. Anyway, I guess I found the comment a little insensitive.<<"Data Dog - Think of it this way. How often do women stay with an abuser? Some even allow their children to suffer abuse, because they won't leave their man. Faithful JW women are like that, they are actually weak, dominated by a male-driven organization. They are having their egos played like a fiddle, but they love it, they want it, they need it. They need to be "special.">>"
parents are forced by the org to regard their disfellowshipped children as if they were dead, non-existent - even if their child was in dire straits.
's feel when they hear that it's ok for elders to try and encourage disfellowshipped ones back to the org, but they can't?.
what the org says: km 8/02 p. 4 par.
Agree totally The Searcher.
Is the shunning principle greater than the 'necessary family business' principle or not and how do they decide? When all involved are independent adults why is there even an exception for necessary family business?
There are situations where a mature woman would be more suitable in discussing issues with another female than any Elder and there could be no scriptural principle prohibiting this policy, specially if it was instigated at the direction of an Elder.
When it comes to policies like shunning, I don't doubt they come up with ideas that they think will benefit the organization the most and then find bible scriptures to fit, no matter how loosely they might relate.
i was disfellowshipped three times in all and on every occasion fought to come back for reasons known to most here, family.. the second time, i steeled myself to attend the meeting for the announcement and one of the elders who had been on my committee concluded the meeting.. he asked me to conclude with prayer!
is that the quickest reinstatement on the planet?
"go, you are dead to me.
I can believe that Slidin Fast. They are like robots and operate on procedures and formalities that real life does not compute.
Was there any 'damage control' by the Elders?
the november 2016 watchtower is now available and it has more new light but i can't quite figure out what they are saying.
it relates to when the jws were released from the captivity of babylon the great (false religion).
i am not attempting to discuss that in this post.
The November 2016 Watchtower is now available and it has more new light but I can't quite figure out what they are saying. It relates to when the JWs were released from the captivity of Babylon the Great (false religion). I am not attempting to discuss that in this post. Rather, it also provides information on suggestions regarding getting out of the JW religion, since it is also a false religion.
The first article is titled "Released from Darkness" and the second is "They broke free from false religion". It's the second article that has some good information. You've really got to wonder whether some of these writers are awake and providing help to apostates.
3 God-fearing men and women knew what they must do. They could not expect to receive God’s blessing if they continued to support false religious organizations. Consequently, many Bible Students prepared letters of withdrawal from their churches. In some cases, they read the letters publicly at church meetings. Where a public reading was forbidden, some sent copies to every member of the church. They wanted no further dealings with false religion! In another era, such a bold move would have cost them dearly. But in many countries in the late 1800’s,the church was beginning to lose the backing ofthe State. Without fear of reprisals in such countries, citizens were free to discuss religious matters and to disagree openly with the established churches.
The Bible Students understood that it was not enough for them to inform relatives, close friends, and church members of their stand on false religion. The whole world needed to see Babylon the Great for what it is—a religious prostitute! Accordingly, between December 1917 and early 1918, the few thousand Bible Students zealously distributed 10,000,000 copies of a tract featuring the subject “The Fall of Babylon”—a hard-hitting indictment of Christendom. As you can imagine, the clergy were furious; but undeterred, the Bible Students kept right on with this important work. They were determined to obey “God as ruler rather than men.” (Acts 5:29) What can we conclude? That far from becoming enslaved to Babylon the Great during the war,these Christian men and women were breaking free from its influence and were helping others to do so.
i have been studying with the jw since june of 2016 and they say only the ones who make up the 144.
000 and can partake of the bread and cup.
is this true?.
The organization goes into great depth explaining who shouldn't partake yet they can't explain how those who think they are anointed believe this to be so and they tell you it would be rude to ask them.
video is entitled "beware of deceit" he uses the letter of jude to show that current day apostates are deceitful and that they use "trickery" to and "twist facts" to try to "grab our mind".
warning: your head might explode.
especially past the 5:30 mark.
Boroean Pickets has done a thorough review on this talk if you're interested
#4 there are two ways to get sins wiped outthe following five scriptures lay the foundation stone of christianity, namely, that christ died for people's sins.
virtually every christian denomination on earth accepts these bible statements without question: .
(matthew 26:28) "....this means my ‘blood of the covenant,’ which is to be poured out in behalf of many for forgiveness of sins.
The org. also teaches that it depends on what sort of sin is being committed. 6 months ago there was a demonstration presented on the monthly JW broadcast and they classified sin into three groups, using bread loaves to demonstrate it
All loaves were slightly smeared with garlic powder, indicating that everyone was imperfect.
The first loaf was spoiled with a toxic dye and represented someone committing the unforgivable sin. This could not be removed and the loaf was useless and put in the rubbish bin
The second loaf was muddied which represented an individual committing a gross sin. The muddied part could be cut off and the rest of the loaf was acceptable.
The third loaf was doused with an extra dose of garlic powder, this represented 'grieving the holy spirit' and was fixed by dusting the additional garlic powder off and it was then good to go.
The unforgivable sin cannot be forgiven but the org. have given up on giving examples of what would qualify as an unforgivable sin.