talking about europe and the western world....
I held my sisters hand at a theme park, mainly to avoid getting seperated in the crowd.
I'm sure if we didn't look so much alike people would have probably thought we were dating.
People are jerks, if you aren't physically tethered to your groupmates they'll just squeeze between you.
talking about europe and the western world....
Was it like this:
Or was it like this:
i met a jw in town yesterday while i was wearing this t shirt.
it didn't even occur to me it was a problem because it is a joke , but he seemed really annoyed about it and kind of cut me short.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/mans-true-evolution-birthday-present/dp/b006fy58zm/ref=sr_1_10?ie=utf8&qid=1332946372&sr=8-10.
NO SPAM
Oh wait, nevermind.
the last time i cried was about 5 weeks when i attempted suidice.. .
what was the last event that made you shed a tear?
.
Last time I cried was about a year ago on the way home from work. I was bored so I tried to see if I could make myself cry just by thinking about it.
It worked but then I realized it was a pretty dumb idea to cry and drive at the same time so I stopped.
I haven't been able to make myself cry again since then.
the last time i cried was about 5 weeks when i attempted suidice.. .
what was the last event that made you shed a tear?
.
so to make a long story short, my family found out about my "apostacy"(i couldn't take it anymore) and now everything is all in shambles.
they still feel there is "hope" for me.
(ha!).
It all depends on your goal.
Is it to convince him that 607 is wrong?
Or is it to make him understand why you think 607 is wrong?
They may seem like the same thing, but they're not.
If it's just to show him why you think it's wrong, then YOU get to lay the ground rules. You can tell him what kind of evidence you'll accept and what kind you won't accept. You can say: "I don't trust the watchtower not to lie, so I would accept their articles as a source."
On the other hand, if your goal is to convince him that 607 is wrong, then you need to follow HIS rules, you need to ask your dad: "What kind of evidence will you accept? Will you assume that every non watchtower source is lying if they disagree with 607? Or will you accept archaeological evidence if it's different from the what the watchtower says?" in other words: "What would it take to convince you that the watchtower is wrong about this?" and if the answer is: "Nothing could possibly convince me" then you're off the hook and can spend the rest of the evening talking about something more fun, like toenail clippings for example.
march 26, 2012. news item:.
jehovah's witnesses to reduce pages in watchtower & awake!
magazines.
So now through careful negotiation with satan, the internet has been handed back to God.
That was pretty funny.
was looking at hypnosis ( always wondered why it works so well on some people - not because i want to convince everyone i meet to be my slaves - honestly ;) ) and i read something that stopped me in my tracks.
the articles author stated that most of the time we are in a state of hypnosis which is no more than our automated systems taking over from our conscious ones for example, when we drive home and realise we didn't think too hard about driving we just 'arrive home' we are in a mild hypnotic state; when we get immersed in a movie and lose our sense of where we are we are in a suggestible world where we potentially get moved by what we see etc.
all these are indicators of our conscious self focusing in such a way that our actual behaviours are handed over to our sub-conscious brain which is also our long term learning process.
the june 15th 2012 study watchtower, paragraph 6 on page 26 has this statement; "the gospel writer luke .
traced all things from the start with accuracy, to write them in logical order.
(luke 1:3) gods spirit ensured that human .
Matthew does not mention Judas leaving at all.
Mark does not mention Judas leaving at all.
Luke does not mention Judas leaving at all, and in fact states that he was there AFTER the passing of the emblems.
John DOES mention Judas leaving early, but does not say when it took place in relation to the passing of the emblems.
Also it's worth mentioning that, according to JW dates, John was written a good 30 years after the other 3 gospels were completed.
So until then, nobody would have even known that Judas left at all. Let alone before the meal.
Also the word used for 'logical'. If it's not Chronological then what the heck is it? How is it more logical to put Judas at the table after the passing of the emblems if it's important that he was NOT there?
Looking at other translations it sure seems like he's talking about putting them in order based on TIME, not some other unspecified definition of 'logical'. The greek word used was: Kathexes seems to be talking about chronological order to me, if not, I'm honestly pretty confused about what he could have meant.
please let me know the age of the youngest child getting baptised.. i knew of a girl of 11 years.. .
I was 9
