I understand that the "slippery slope theory" is indeed a logical fallacy. But that is immaterial. When dealing with social actors with imperfect information and illogical emotions and passions, their actions can often not be explained by reason or logic.
It was not logical for the Wehrmacht to continue to push into Russia in 1941. Many decisions in history have been made outside the paradigm of logic. When assessing what governments will, or will not do, is not confined to strictly logical analysis.
I think DT and others made an excellent point. If you want to diminsh the influence or population of JW's in your country, best to do it with financial policies. Going for the throat, and simply outright banishing them makes the Witnesses martyrs and only reinvogorates the movement.
The best strategy is to allow the WT organization in Russia to eliminate itself. It may take time, and is a slower process, but it will reap greater and more permanent benefits from the Russian government's perspective.
Of course, I do not condone the above policy perscriptions. I am simply agreeing with DT that IF the Russian government really wanted to secure a future absent Jehovah's Witnesses...the above financial chokehold would be the best way to do it...IMO.
@BAND
I do not see how I have "bragged" about my work. I agree, publishing on the internet invites criticism. But as a long-standing Jehovah's Witness, I have first hand experience of what it feels like to have a lording authority suppress all and any criticism. It is not healthy. Criticism is how any subject grows.
I have appreciated everyone's comments. I posted the article to gain everyone's insights, not to seek unwarranted praise. As a student, I strive to continually become a better writer, researcher, and analyzer in all aspects.
I hope a lively discussion will continue to blossom.